[VOTE] Release Apache Joshua 6.1 (Incubating)

[Tommaso Teofili]

Hi Folks,
Please VOTE on the Apache Joshua 6.1 Release Candidate #3.

We solved 36 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319720=12335049

Git source tag (3447715b3aa0a48ed79465d80618bd5a2f7a7558):
https://s.apache.org/XIxJ

Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejoshua-1004

Source Release Artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/joshua/6.1/

PGP release keys (signed using 891768A5):
*https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-joshua.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;h=aa18365bf5c8c8fb17b084f783a75c3a2460a98d;hb=HEAD
*

Vote will be open for 72 hours.
Thank you to everyone that is able to VOTE as well as everyone that
contributed to Apache Joshua 6.1.

[ ] +1, let's get it released!!!
[ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
[ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)

Regards,
Tommaso

Re: Cutting RC3

[Tommaso Teofili]

cool, release:perform succeeded, now the artifacts are on a single Nexus
staging repo.
I'm pushing the artifacts to /dist and will open the VOTE once uploading
has finished (hopefully before I get old).

Regards,
Tommaso

Il giorno gio 23 feb 2017 alle ore 15:39 Matt Post  ha
scritto:

> Thank you for heading this up, Tommaso! I'll be able to catch up on this
> after today.
>
> matt
>
>
> > On Feb 23, 2017, at 3:06 AM, Tommaso Teofili 
> wrote:
> >
> > probably because of the mentioned network issues the artifacts ended up
> in
> > two separate staging repositories in Nexus, which is undesired.
> > I'll drop those repos, rollback the changes on the pom, delete the
> current
> > tag in git and perform again mvn release:prepare / perform today.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tommaso
> >
> > Il giorno mer 22 feb 2017 alle ore 16:39 Tommaso Teofili <
> > tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Maven is in the extremely slow (because of my bandwidth) process of
> >> deploying stuff on Nexus as part of the mvn release:perform phase.
> >> In the meantime perhaps is a good idea not to commit to the master
> branch,
> >> until we get the RC3 voted and hence approved / rejected.
> >>
> >> Thanks and regards,
> >> Tommaso
> >>
>
>