+1
✓ MD5 sums (tar and zip)
✓ includes DISCLAIMER
✓ build from src distribution (zip and tgz): 168 tests run, 31 skipped
✓ verified both GPG signatures
I agree about Michael's earlier point: the file name is
joshua-incubating-6.1-src.tar.gz but it unpacks to
apache-joshua-incubating-6.1. This discrepancy is okay for now but should be
fixed in the future.
(at some point when we're in person we should exchange GPG keys)
matt
> On Mar 20, 2017, at 9:53 PM, Matt Post wrote:
>
> Folks — This is still in my queue so let's keep this open.
>
> matt
>
>
>> On Mar 16, 2017, at 8:56 PM, John Hewitt wrote:
>>
>> Lewis is right about the week. Sorry, everyone. This week had a DARPA
>> meeting in Atlanta. I'll get my +/-1 out tomorrow.
>>
>> -John
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Michael A. Hedderich <
>> m...@michael-hedderich.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks Tommaso for putting the release together!
>>>
>>> I was traveling to the US, sorry for the delay from my side.
>>>
>>> Here is my list:
>>> - build from tag: passed
>>> - build from staging repo (zip and gz): passed
>>> - build from source release artifacts (zip and gz): passed
>>> - md5, sha1 and acc match within the stagging repo
>>> - md5 and acc match within the source release artifacts
>>>
>>> What does not match for me are the md5 or sha1 of the stagging repo with
>>> those of the source release artifacts. E.g.
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> orgapachejoshua-1005/org/apache/joshua/joshua-incubating/6.1/joshua-
>>> incubating-6.1-src.tar.gz.md5
>>> vs
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/joshua/6.1/
>>> joshua-incubating-6.1-src.tar.gz.md5
>>>
>>> Is this the expected behavior?
>>>
>>> The link to the check-list that Tom Barber had sent around in the past (
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list) does
>>> not seem to be valid anymore. At least for me the anchor point does not
>>> work and I could not find the check-list on this page or one of its
>>> subpages. Does anyone know if this list still exists? If not, should we put
>>> such a list on the Joshua PPMC Wiki?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-03-16 20:11 GMT-04:00 lewis john mcgibbney :
>>>
Hi Tommaso,
It looks like you caught the PPMC on a bad week... we will get the VOTE'd
done worry ;)
Thanks for putting the RC together.
Comments inline
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:58 PM, <
dev-digest-h...@joshua.incubator.apache.org> wrote:
SIGS look good so do tags and staging repos.
On primary release src at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/joshua/6.1/
joshua-incubating-6.1-src.tar.gz,
the compressed archive is called joshua-incubating-6.1-src, when I
decompress it, it is called apache-joshua-6.1-incubating. This is a minor
inconsistency which we may wish to address for next incubating release.
When I build (mvn clean install) I get the following... damn laptop. This
is the same issue I got when I tried to spin the original RC2 myself.
>>> This
is specific to my environment s not a blocker.
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 29.351 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2017-03-16T17:07:16-07:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 41M/697M
[INFO]
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:3.0.0:single
(source-release-assembly) on project joshua-incubating: Execution
source-release-assembly of goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:3.0.0:single failed: user
id
'498339010' is too big ( > 2097151 ). -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
>>> -e
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/
>>> PluginExecutionException
A mvn clean test results in the following
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 18.971 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2017-03-16T17:09:25-07:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 34M/608M
[INFO]
CHANGES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE and README all look good. DOAP is