Hi Matt, Il giorno gio 29 giu 2017 alle ore 05:21 Matt Post <p...@cs.jhu.edu> ha scritto:
> This is definitely a good idea. Many of these branches are dead and are > unlikely to contain much that can be merged in, and are therefore probably > best deleted. The plan for 7 was a big simplification of much of the guts, > but with the transition to neural approaches in the research community, > this is unlikely to be done unless it finds a new champion. > do you think we should look at NMT in the Joshua project ? Or is it more like you are more interested on NMT at the moment ? Or both ? :) Other than that let's merge 7 to master and drop the remaining stuff, except that for the PR for JOSHUA-290 [1] which should be merged into 7 branch. Regards, Tommaso [1] : https://github.com/apache/incubator-joshua/pull/71 > > > > > > On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:43 AM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 for both cleaning up branches *and* merging 7 branch into master. > > > > Regarding branches and Git let me read through the links and I'll share > my > > opinion. > > > > Regards, > > Tommaso > > > > Il giorno mer 28 giu 2017 alle ore 06:41 Chris Mattmann < > mattm...@apache.org> > > ha scritto: > > > >> Hey Team, > >> > >> I recommend that Joshua consider adopting the Tika and/or Nutch > >> contribution > >> policy RE: branches and Git: > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/tika/#contributing-via-github > >> https://github.com/apache/nutch/#contributing > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> > >> On 6/27/17, 9:36 PM, "lewis john mcgibbney" <lewi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Folks, > >> Two things... > >> > >> 1. Currently the branches for Joshua are a bit of a mess... it > >> would be > >> better if they were named after JIRA issues such that the mappings > >> back to > >> some concrete development were explicit. Does anyone want to clean > >> these up? > >> 2. Now that 6.1-incubating is released and live, Is there any > >> desire to > >> merge 7.X branch into master and continue development there? I was > >> not > >> involved with the 7.X development but it looked like a significant > >> step > >> forward... it would be a shame for that work to stagnate. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> lewis > >> > >> -- > >> http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ > >> @hectorMcSpector > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
