Re: Downloading of non ASF licensed code
Hi Matt, Can you please open a ticket for this and commit to master branch? Thanks On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:49 AM, <dev-digest-h...@joshua.incubator.apache.org > wrote: > From: Matt Post <p...@cs.jhu.edu> > To: dev@joshua.incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:16:26 -0500 > Subject: Re: Downloading of non ASF licensed code > This would be easy to do. Maybe just a simple prompt that alerts the user? > Something like > > echo "Warning: this script downloads many tools used in building > and running" > echo "Joshua. Not all of them are Apache Licensed. If you wish to > continue, hit Enter". > read j > if [[ ! -z $j ]]; then > echo "Quitting." > fi > > >
Re: Downloading of non ASF licensed code
This would be easy to do. Maybe just a simple prompt that alerts the user? Something like echo "Warning: this script downloads many tools used in building and running" echo "Joshua. Not all of them are Apache Licensed. If you wish to continue, hit Enter". read j if [[ ! -z $j ]]; then echo "Quitting." fi > On Nov 25, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Tom Barberwrote: > > This may have come up before in the whole licensing chat so apologies if > I'm just going over old ground. > > The download-deps.sh file obviously downloads and builds stuff with non ASF > licenses, I realise this is for model training purposes only, and 99.9% > wont care, but should we consider putting a prompt into that script warning > people. I ask because a company might add in the training modules blindly > assuming because the script is distributed by the ASF the modules are also > ASL2.0. > > Just a thought. > > Tom > > -- > Tom Barber > CTO Spicule LTD > t...@spicule.co.uk > > http://spicule.co.uk > > GB: +44(0)5603641316 > US: +18448141689
Downloading of non ASF licensed code
This may have come up before in the whole licensing chat so apologies if I'm just going over old ground. The download-deps.sh file obviously downloads and builds stuff with non ASF licenses, I realise this is for model training purposes only, and 99.9% wont care, but should we consider putting a prompt into that script warning people. I ask because a company might add in the training modules blindly assuming because the script is distributed by the ASF the modules are also ASL2.0. Just a thought. Tom -- Tom Barber CTO Spicule LTD t...@spicule.co.uk http://spicule.co.uk GB: +44(0)5603641316 US: +18448141689