dreamhead wrote:
Hi!
Here is a bug from a Chinese Forum.It's the link if you can read
Chinese. :)
http://www.javaeye.com/topic/101327
if "string"
puts "true"
else
puts "false"
end
C Ruby: true
JRuby: false
We know all objects should be true except false and nil, so it's a bug.
I have d
Hi!
Here is a bug from a Chinese Forum.It's the link if you can read Chinese. :)
http://www.javaeye.com/topic/101327
if "string"
puts "true"
else
puts "false"
end
C Ruby: true
JRuby: false
We know all objects should be true except false and nil, so it's a bug.
I have debugged the code. Th
I currently have two strategies implemented for serialization and
persistence. Both require storing the runtime in a thread local
variable 'currentRuntime'. They fetch the runtime from there when
they need it via a Ruby.getCurrentRuntime() call. I would like to
hear your critiques and comm
We use a concurrent HashMap in our persistence to control concurrent
access to the persistent object by multiple users. It's called
CuHashMap. I assume that I need to create a RubyClass that dispatches
to it because I get a NullPointerException (no metaclass) when I try
to store objects in
Here is the sample code that I have been using to persist some simple
objects:
To write persistent objects
require 'java'
require 'employee'
require 'persistence'
include Persistence
persistent 'people'
person = Person.new('Alan')
employee = Employee.new('Bob', 12345)
@people.store(person)
@
(blogged also)
Compilers are hard. But not so hard as people would have you believe.
I've committed an update that installs a CallAdapter for every compiled
call site. CallAdapter is basically an abstract class that stores the
following:
- method name
- method index
- call type (normal, func
