For whom is JRuby intended for?
I tend to agree with what Charles said earlier, that only those who
contribute code to JRuby have a say in this process. Having observed the
discussion for the past few days, I noticed that most contributors are
calling for move to Java 5. This seems to be a good re
eliminating test console blabber, possible difference from MRI
--
Key: JRUBY-1249
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-1249
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Test
Component
On 7/29/07, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So, once again, the question of which should be the minimum Java version
> to run JRuby. We are currently at 1.4.2, but the proposal is to move to
> 5 for trunk and all major releases from now on. This does not concern
> the 1.0.x-series.
Ola Bini wrote:
> I'm feeling deeply torn, especially since I know many of the features
> of Java 5 will make our lives easier. Can we go the middleground?
> Development and building has to be done with Java 5 or later, meaning
> that the source code can contain annotations, which we can use to do
Hi,
So, once again, the question of which should be the minimum Java version
to run JRuby. We are currently at 1.4.2, but the proposal is to move to
5 for trunk and all major releases from now on. This does not concern
the 1.0.x-series.
I wrote a blog post about it, and got quite many replie
