Allow Ruby naming conventions when implementing abstract methods of extended
abstract Java classes
--
Key: JRUBY-3418
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3418
Paul Fraser wrote:
I have not been able to find any reference to this type of failure in
JRuby.
Is this a known problem? Should it be reported as a bug?
Not unless it fails on trunk too...can you show us a full backtrace?
If it fails on trunk, definitely file it ASAP.
- Charlie
--
helpers do
def em(text)
"#{text}
end
Ruby 1.8.6 works OK.
JRuby 1.1.4 fails with "wrong number of arguments(0 for 1)
helpers is defined as:-
def helpers(*extensions, &block)
class_eval(&block) if block_given?
include *extensions
end
I have not been able to find any reference to thi
I think it's time we bailed on the mailing list and repository at
RubyForge for JRuby-Extras. It has served us well, but RubyForge is
showing its age.
I just moved JRuby-OpenSSL to GitHub, and several other projects have
moved as well. I propose we move everything and shut this noisemaker down
The source for jruby-openssl is now hosted on GitHub under the JRuby
project account:
http://github.com/jruby/jruby-openssl/tree/master
Please go there for updates. We will hopefully publish a new release
soon, to go along with JRuby 1.2.
- Charlie
--
Compiler losing a break jump
Key: JRUBY-3417
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3417
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Compiler
Reporter: Charles Oliver Nutter
Can't rescue IOExceptions from jruby-openssl.
-
Key: JRUBY-3416
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3416
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: OpenSSL
Affects Versions: JR
In the Java world, its the nature of the linkage that's key. Cast
your mind back to the way we used to load a SAX parser. We used to
set a system property for javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory and
use DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance() in the code.
This allowed your Java to not i
Now, I'm not challenging Richard Stallman, but postgres is BSD and has
the ability to link to the readline library. They don't distribute it
though. So it depends on the packages that the user has installed.
It seems to prefer editline, but will use readline if available.
http://search.postgresq
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Wayne Meissner wrote:
That correct, with a small wrinkle. Where there is an ABI compatible
library, which can be used as a complete replacement, and the binary
is dynamically linked, then it could be argued that the code is
intended to link with the ABI compatible l
Wayne Meissner wrote:
2009/2/18 Conrad Meyer :
I was under the impression that non-GPL code could not link statically or
dynamically with GPL libraries, and that this was one of the major differences
between the GPL and LGPL. This is certainly Stallman's opinion (he cites
That correct, with a
Wayne Meissner wrote:
That correct, with a small wrinkle. Where there is an ABI compatible
library, which can be used as a complete replacement, and the binary
is dynamically linked, then it could be argued that the code is
intended to link with the ABI compatible library, and not the GPLed
vari
2009/2/18 Conrad Meyer :
> I was under the impression that non-GPL code could not link statically or
> dynamically with GPL libraries, and that this was one of the major differences
> between the GPL and LGPL. This is certainly Stallman's opinion (he cites
That correct, with a small wrinkle. Wher
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 12:00:11 am Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> Conrad Meyer wrote:
> > Keep in mind, GNU readline is GPL. So I think in order to keep JRuby's
> > license as permissive as it is, you'll need to use editline instead (a
> > non-GPL readline replacement).
>
> Well, that's cert
Conrad Meyer wrote:
Keep in mind, GNU readline is GPL. So I think in order to keep JRuby's license
as permissive as it is, you'll need to use editline instead (a non-GPL
readline replacement).
Well, that's certainly something to consider, but of course we wouldn't
actually copy, distribute, o
15 matches
Mail list logo
