Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
The only hope for being able to re-throw a checked exception without
declaring that I'm throwing it would be to generate non-Java bytecode
that does the throw for me. But I will give it a try with unchecked
exceptions and see how it goes.
Attached is an updated ve
Oliver
Nutter
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jruby-dev] Including interpreted Ruby frames in Java stack trace
Peter K Chan wrote:
> Charles,
> I tried out the patch, but there is a small bug: the expression
> implementationClass.ge
Peter K Chan wrote:
Charles,
I tried out the patch, but there is a small bug: the expression
implementationClass.getBaseName() sometimes return null, thus causing a NPE
when constructing a StackTraceElement.
I am a little confused about the purpose of the patch though. Is it
s
arles Oliver
Nutter
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 12:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [jruby-dev] Including interpreted Ruby frames in Java stack trace
Attached is a patch that makes it possible to include interpreted Ruby method
information in the Java stack trace of a raised exception.
Attached is a patch that makes it possible to include interpreted Ruby
method information in the Java stack trace of a raised exception. This
mechanism would help users of Ruby from Java produce a stack trace that
shows exactly where an error happened, including both Ruby and Java
stack trace i
