On 7/29/07, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I wrote a blog post about it, and got quite many replies. Almost all of
> them very positive about going to 5, but there were a few that
> represents my gut feel about it. Take this for example, from Jesper:
> I think for a lot of users
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
Durgin
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 5:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jruby-dev] Java version
On 7/29/07, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
So, once again, the question of which should be the min
On 7/29/07, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So, once again, the question of which should be the minimum Java version
> to run JRuby. We are currently at 1.4.2, but the proposal is to move to
> 5 for trunk and all major releases from now on. This does not concern
> the 1.0.x-series.
Ola Bini wrote:
> I'm feeling deeply torn, especially since I know many of the features
> of Java 5 will make our lives easier. Can we go the middleground?
> Development and building has to be done with Java 5 or later, meaning
> that the source code can contain annotations, which we can use to do
Hi,
So, once again, the question of which should be the minimum Java version
to run JRuby. We are currently at 1.4.2, but the proposal is to move to
5 for trunk and all major releases from now on. This does not concern
the 1.0.x-series.
I wrote a blog post about it, and got quite many replie
