Re: [jruby-dev] Proposal: performance work slides to second priority under bugs

2007-12-20 Thread MenTaLguY
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:59:28 -0600, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that from now until we get the next 1.1 prerelease out (post > beta 2), performance work should be a second priority. We're currently > at 45 open bugs on 1.0 branch, 103 on 1.1 branch (trunk...and 3 a

Re: [jruby-dev] Proposal: performance work slides to second priority under bugs

2007-12-20 Thread Thomas E Enebo
yes! On 12/20/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that from now until we get the next 1.1 prerelease out (post > beta 2), performance work should be a second priority. We're currently > at 45 open bugs on 1.0 branch, 103 on 1.1 branch (trunk...and 3 are high > prioriti

Re: [jruby-dev] Proposal: performance work slides to second priority under bugs

2007-12-20 Thread Matt Fletcher
I like the idea because of my own selfish reason: the things stopping me from upgrading JRuby in my project are bugs, not performance problems.

Re: [jruby-dev] Proposal: performance work slides to second priority under bugs

2007-12-20 Thread Ola Bini
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: I propose that from now until we get the next 1.1 prerelease out (post beta 2), performance work should be a second priority. We're currently at 45 open bugs on 1.0 branch, 103 on 1.1 branch (trunk...and 3 are high priorities for 1.1b2), 8 scheduled for "1.x", and 1

[jruby-dev] Proposal: performance work slides to second priority under bugs

2007-12-20 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
I propose that from now until we get the next 1.1 prerelease out (post beta 2), performance work should be a second priority. We're currently at 45 open bugs on 1.0 branch, 103 on 1.1 branch (trunk...and 3 are high priorities for 1.1b2), 8 scheduled for "1.x", and 143 unscheduled. I believe we