perfect!
-Tom
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
>> I completely agree bugs like 'Math spec failing' suck since they don't
>> really tell you what is broken and they also are also possibly
>> open-ended dependin
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
> I completely agree bugs like 'Math spec failing' suck since they don't
> really tell you what is broken and they also are also possibly
> open-ended depending on when we update our spec tags.
And we often have tags disappear without realizi
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> I should elaborate on this slightly. I think it is valid to have a bug
> in the tracker for failing specs under these circumstances:
>
> 1. If work has started on the bug and it requires a place for discussion.
> 2. If there's already
I should elaborate on this slightly. I think it is valid to have a bug
in the tracker for failing specs under these circumstances:
1. If work has started on the bug and it requires a place for discussion.
2. If there's already a bug filed with *useful* discussion.
3. If there's a patch that requir
