Matt Fletcher wrote:
Ola,
I'm using JRuby for a commercial, closed-source application, so I'm
sensitive to the licenses of JRuby and the libraries it is dependent
on. So far, so good...nothing terribly restrictive like GPL is
required so far.
I don't know exactly what REJ is, but from some
Ola,
I'm using JRuby for a commercial, closed-source application, so I'm
sensitive to the licenses of JRuby and the libraries it is dependent on. So
far, so good...nothing terribly restrictive like GPL is required so far.
I don't know exactly what REJ is, but from some quick searches it looks lik
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Ola Bini wrote:
Not really. All gains would disappear from that, including heightened
compatibility in most String methods. I don't think that's a good
approach.
Ahh, because of the byte[]/char[] thing. Makes sense.
- Charlie
Yes, but also all the mbc stuff that
Ola Bini wrote:
Not really. All gains would disappear from that, including heightened
compatibility in most String methods. I don't think that's a good approach.
Ahh, because of the byte[]/char[] thing. Makes sense.
- Charlie
---
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Ola Bini wrote:
Hi
During the last days I've revived my REJ port of the MRI regular
expression engine and integrated with trunk. The result is available
in the jruby-reg branch. I'm mailing this out now, because at this
point the engine runs the full JRuby test s
Ola Bini wrote:
Hi
During the last days I've revived my REJ port of the MRI regular
expression engine and integrated with trunk. The result is available in
the jruby-reg branch. I'm mailing this out now, because at this point
the engine runs the full JRuby test suite - plus several tests that
Hi
During the last days I've revived my REJ port of the MRI regular
expression engine and integrated with trunk. The result is available in
the jruby-reg branch. I'm mailing this out now, because at this point
the engine runs the full JRuby test suite - plus several tests that
JRuby trunk doe
