Thomas E Enebo wrote:
Getting a decent list of which types of regexps are slower and which
ones are faster would be good to see. It all comes down to a
trade-off and it is important to make sure we are not killing
something common by making this the default. If we see a list of the
types of re
Getting a decent list of which types of regexps are slower and which
ones are faster would be good to see. It all comes down to a
trade-off and it is important to make sure we are not killing
something common by making this the default. If we see a list of the
types of regexps someone may scream
I think we're getting close to considering merging Ola's Rej-based code
into trunk, since although there's more perf work to do on it, it
already eliminates the byte[]/char[] conversion overhead.
Right now it's not compiling for me, so look into that if you can Ola.
But what about some discuss
