On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mnwicket wrote:
>
> > So I understand that jruby can create a class impl at any time...but can
> > it
> > handle the above situation...the difference being the impl is an
> > abstract
> > class.
> >
>
> Ahh I see.
mnwicket wrote:
So I understand that jruby can create a class impl at any time...but can it
handle the above situation...the difference being the impl is an abstract
class.
Ahh I seewell we can extend abstract classes, but I don't think we
have a shortcut syntax that would work for it. Wha
Wicket is much like swing when it comes to using anonymous inner classes...so
here is simple wicket example with is very common to wicket; This Link
object is a common component available in wicket...just trying to show the
structure.
class abstract Link extends Component {
public Link(String
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
mnwicket wrote:
So I'm a little confuseddoes jruby support anonymous inner classes?
I'm interested in getting wicket working with jruby on rails.
What does wicket need with anonymous inner classes?
I suppose the answer is "yes", since you can create a class i
mnwicket wrote:
So I'm a little confuseddoes jruby support anonymous inner classes?
I'm interested in getting wicket working with jruby on rails.
What does wicket need with anonymous inner classes?
I suppose the answer is "yes", since you can create a class impl at any
time.
- Charlie
So I'm a little confuseddoes jruby support anonymous inner classes?
I'm interested in getting wicket working with jruby on rails.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/jruby-and-anonymous-inner-classes-tp16828974p16828974.html
Sent from the JRuby - Dev mailing list archive