Hi Alistair, thanks for posting! Comments below...
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Alistair Bush wrote:
> May I suggest that the "sweet spot" for linux binaries is to have them
> packaged by there respective distro. Linux users really should be using their
> package manager for installing jrub
> On 9 March 2010 17:31, Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
> > I think Wayne had some thoughts on how to build the launcher so that
> > it would be compatible with as much Linux distros as possible (by
> > carefully selecting the toolchain and compiler/lib versions).
>
> The "sweet spot" I found for linux
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
> How big would the launcher be if we statically linked libc? That is
> the only dynamic load library we have right? A little extra size with
> zero dyn-linking issues may be worth it
libc seems like one of those things that would have
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:54 PM, David Calavera wrote:
> I just did some modification to the Mac installer and I think now it could
> be ready for a first version.
> Here is the repo: http://github.com/calavera/jruby-mac-installer
> Basically, now it creates this directories structure when the pack
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Wayne Meissner wrote:
> On 9 March 2010 17:31, Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
>
>> I think Wayne had some thoughts on how to build the launcher so that
>> it would be compatible with as much Linux distros as possible (by
>> carefully selecting the toolchain and compiler/l
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Wayne Meissner wrote:
>> Personally, I think that having prebuilt bundles for
>> Windows/MacOS/Linux would be more than enough.
>
> What? You mean we're not going to ship pre-built launchers for
> alpha-dec-openvms ?
>
> :)
Heheh, yeah, I was afraid that we would
On 9 March 2010 17:31, Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
> I think Wayne had some thoughts on how to build the launcher so that
> it would be compatible with as much Linux distros as possible (by
> carefully selecting the toolchain and compiler/lib versions).
The "sweet spot" I found for linux binaries is
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
>>> * Native launcher...is it ready to go?
>>
>> Ready to go. We're continuing to make tweaks, but those can be picked
>> up separately via gem install. We should also move the launcher to
>> 1.0.
>
> Awesome. I realized today I hav
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Nick Sieger wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
> wrote:
>> Ok, we want to go to RC real soon now. Here's a few things I think are
>> still left unresolved that we need to deal with:
>>
>> * Native launcher...is it ready to go?
>
> Ready
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:54 PM, David Calavera wrote:
> I just did some modification to the Mac installer and I think now it could
> be ready for a first version.
> Here is the repo: http://github.com/calavera/jruby-mac-installer
> Basically, now it creates this directories structure when the pack
30 seconds after clicking the "Send" button I just found a bug XD, I'm
installing the native launcher when the installer is been built but I should
install it when the user is installing the package, it's a quite easy
modification.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:54 PM, David Calavera wrote:
> I just d
I just did some modification to the Mac installer and I think now it could
be ready for a first version.
Here is the repo: http://github.com/calavera/jruby-mac-installer
Basically, now it creates this directories structure when the package is
installed:
/Library/Frameworks
|
| -> JRuby.fra
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Hirotsugu Asari wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Nick Sieger wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
> > wrote:
> >> Ok, we want to go to RC real soon now. Here's a few things I think are
> >> still left unresolved that we need to
On Mar 8, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Nick Sieger wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
> wrote:
>> Ok, we want to go to RC real soon now. Here's a few things I think are
>> still left unresolved that we need to deal with:
>>
>> * Bugs marked for 1.5 (44 of them). Obviously we'r
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> Ok, we want to go to RC real soon now. Here's a few things I think are
> still left unresolved that we need to deal with:
>
> * Bugs marked for 1.5 (44 of them). Obviously we're not going to get
> them all in, so we need to start whitt
15 matches
Mail list logo
