On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Robert Lougher wrote:
> A quick FYI. JamVM is definitely not dead! I'm still actively
> developing/maintaining it (I'm the sole developer, and have been for over 10
> years - Pekka Enberg forked JamVM at one point but abandoned it and moved
> onto Jato as I woul
File an issue for this please. I think we could make Java arrays
trivially serializable by giving them named classes rather than
anonymous classes.
A possible workaround might be this:
$ jirb
irb(main):001:0> bytes = 'foo'.to_java_bytes
=> byte[102, 111, 111]@c5a311d
irb(main):002:0> bytes.class
