[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-3745) Consider adding join key to ValueJoiner interface

Greg Fodor created KAFKA-3745: - Summary: Consider adding join key to ValueJoiner interface Key: KAFKA-3745 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3745 Project: Kafka Issue Type:

Re: [DISCUSS] scalability limits in the coordinator

I like Jun's suggestion in changing the handling logics of single large message on the consumer side. As for the case of "a single group subscribing to 3000 topics", with 100 consumers the 2.5Mb Gzip size is reasonable to me (when storing in ZK, we also have the znode limit which is set to 1Mb by

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-3744) Message format needs to identify serializer

David Kay created KAFKA-3744: Summary: Message format needs to identify serializer Key: KAFKA-3744 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3744 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (KAFKA-3698) Update website documentation when it comes to the message format

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Kay updated KAFKA-3698: - Comment: was deleted (was: Kafka documentation on message formats needs to be more explicit for new

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-3698) Update website documentation when it comes to the message format

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15295738#comment-15295738 ] David Kay commented on KAFKA-3698: -- Kafka documentation on message formats needs to be more explicit for

[jira] [Assigned] (KAFKA-3511) Add common aggregation functions like Sum and Avg as build-ins in Kafka Streams DSL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eno Thereska reassigned KAFKA-3511: --- Assignee: Eno Thereska (was: Ishita Mandhan) > Add common aggregation functions like Sum

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-3743) kafka-server-start.sh: Unhelpful error message

Magnus Edenhill created KAFKA-3743: -- Summary: kafka-server-start.sh: Unhelpful error message Key: KAFKA-3743 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3743 Project: Kafka Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-3726) Enable cold storage option

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15295541#comment-15295541 ] Radoslaw Gruchalski commented on KAFKA-3726: [~benstopford]: This is exactly what I pointed

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk7 #1308

See Changes: [ismael] MINOR: Specify keyalg RSA for SSL key generation -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on H11 (docker Ubuntu

[jira] [Comment Edited] (KAFKA-3647) Unable to set a ssl provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15295489#comment-15295489 ] Ismael Juma edited comment on KAFKA-3647 at 5/22/16 9:24 AM: - The

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-3647) Unable to set a ssl provider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15295489#comment-15295489 ] Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-3647: The documentation specified a command that generates RSA keys by

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-0.10.0-jdk7 #102

See Changes: [ismael] MINOR: Specify keyalg RSA for SSL key generation -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on H10 (docker Ubuntu

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk8 #643

See Changes: [ismael] MINOR: Specify keyalg RSA for SSL key generation -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on ubuntu-2 (docker Ubuntu

[GitHub] kafka pull request: Specifiy keyalg RSA for SSL key generation.

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1416 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is