Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #382

See Changes: -- [...truncated 488749 lines...] [2021-08-02T02:36:19.519Z] [2021-08-02T02:36:19.519Z] ApiVersionsRequestTest >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-690: Add additional configuration to control MirrorMaker 2 internal topics naming convention

+1 (binding). Thank you for your patience and clear explanations, Omnia. On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:39 PM Omnia Ibrahim wrote: > Bumping up this voting thread. > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 1:57 PM Omnia Ibrahim > wrote: > > > Hi, > > Can I get 2 more +1 binding for this KIP? > > Thanks > > > >

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #381

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.0 #76

See Changes: -- [...truncated 412952 lines...] [2021-08-02T00:35:45.717Z] [2021-08-02T00:35:45.717Z] DeleteOffsetsConsumerGroupCommandIntegrationTest >

[VOTE] KIP-764 Configurable backlog size for creating Acceptor

Hi, Kafka. I would like to start a vote on KIP that makes SocketServer acceptor's backlog size configurable. KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-764%3A+Configurable+backlog+size+for+creating+Acceptor Discussion thread:

Re: [VOTE] KIP-707: The future of KafkaFuture

Hi Tom, We don't want to break source code compatibility, so I think we should avoid removing this exception. best, Colin On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, at 06:00, Tom Bentley wrote: > During code review Chia-Ping noticed that the `throws InterruptedException` > clause on the declaration of

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-13114) Unregsiter listener during renounce when the in-memory snapshot is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Gustafson resolved KAFKA-13114. - Resolution: Fixed > Unregsiter listener during renounce when the in-memory snapshot is

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-655: Windowed "Distinct" Operation for KStream

Hi Bruno, I'm sorry for the delay with the answer. Unfortunately your messages were put to spam folder, that's why I didn't answer them right away. Concerning your question about comparing serialized values vs. using equals: I think it must be clear now due to John's explanations. Distinct