Hi everyone,
With +3 binding votes (and +2 non-binding), the vote passes.
*KIP-979* Allow independently stop KRaft processes is Adopted!
Thank you all for your reviews and votes.
Regards,
Hailey
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:43 PM Hailey Ni wrote:
> Thanks Justine!
>
> On Fri, Nov
Thanks Justine!
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:40 AM Justine Olshan
wrote:
> Thanks Hailey for the update. +1 (binding) from me :)
>
> Justine
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:32 AM Hailey Ni
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Justine,
> >
> > Thank you very much for the
Hailey.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Colin
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, at 15:13, Hailey Ni wrote:
> > > Hi Colin,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your review. I removed the "absolute path need to be
> > > provided" line from the
on can be given. What
> happens if both are given?
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, at 12:20, Hailey Ni wrote:
> > Hi Ron,
> >
> > I've added the "Rejected Alternatives" section in the KIP. Thanks for the
> > comments and +1 vote!
t; >
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 9:48 AM Kamal Chandraprakash
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, 12:55
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote on KIP-979 that will allow users to independently
stop KRaft processes.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-979%3A+Allow+independently+stop+KRaft+processes
Thanks,
Hailey
th the other tools, I would suggest to use
> --process-role and --node-id (hyphen instead of dot). Can you also
> update the KIP?
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 10:18 PM Hailey Ni
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kamal,
> >
> > I think the broker.id property has been
).
Thanks,
Hailey
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 1:17 PM Hailey Ni wrote:
> Hi Ismeal,
>
> Thanks for the comments. I'll change the implementation to use a pair of
> mutually exclusive args --process.roles and --node.id.
>
> Thanks,
> Hailey
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 6:34 AM
t; Thanks for the KIP. I think this approach based on configs is a bit too
> > > open ended and not very user friendly. Why don't we simply provide
> flags
> > > for the things a user may care about? So far, it seems like we have two
> > > good candidates (node id and proces
t seems it would probably be easier to not have to worry
> about restricting to specific cases, actually. WDYT?
>
> Ron
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 5:12 PM Hailey Ni
> wrote:
> >
> > Updated. Please let me know if you have any additional comments. Thank
> you!
> &
Updated. Please let me know if you have any additional comments. Thank you!
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 3:02 PM Hailey Ni wrote:
> Hi Ron. Thanks for the response. I agree with your point. I'll make the
> corresponding changes in the KIP and KAFKA-15471
> <https://issues.apache.org
ut if it is easy to achieve
> and doesn't add any additional cognitive load -- and at first glance
> it does seem so -- we should probably just support it.
>
> Ron
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 6:15 PM Hailey Ni
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ron,
> >
> > Thank you ve
=controller. But if they did want to stop a particular
> controller they could then also achieve that via kafka-server-stop
> --required-config node.id=1 (for example). What do you think?
>
> Ron
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 5:56 PM Hailey Ni
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
>
Hailey Ni created KAFKA-15471:
-
Summary: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers
Key: KAFKA-15471
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15471
Project: Kafka
Issue Type
Hi all,
I would like to start the discussion about *KIP-979: Allow independently
stop KRaft controllers or brokers* <
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-979%3A+Allow+independently+stop+KRaft+controllers+or+brokers
>
It proposes adding an optional field "--process.roles " in the
Hi,
This is Hailey. Wiki ID: hni. May I request edit permission to the Kafka
Wiki please?
Thanks,
Hailey
Hi,
Can I get edit access to Apache Kafka's Wiki please?
Thanks,
Hailey
17 matches
Mail list logo
