Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

t; build a new cluster, it's inconvenient for them to have to manually enable > each feature. > > 112. DeleteFeaturesResponse: It seems the apiKey should be 49 instead of > 48. > > Jun > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:27 AM Kowshik Prakasam > wrote: > > > Hey Jun, &

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

is a required section in a KIP. > And we should also write down the new error codes we will be introducing in > this KIP, and include both new and old error codes in the Response schema > comment if possible. For example, UpdateFeatureResponse could expect a > `NOT_CONTROLLER` error code.

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

Hi all, Any other feedback on this KIP before we start the vote? Cheers, Kowshik On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:27 AM Kowshik Prakasam wrote: > Hey Jun, > > Thanks a lot for the great feedback! Please note that the design > has changed a little bit on the KIP, and we now propagate t

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

sions. Why are the versions 3+ > when the top version is bumped to 6? > "fields": [ > {"name": "Name", "type": "string", "versions": "3+", > "about": "The name of the feature.&

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

? > > Boyang > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:10 AM Kowshik Prakasam > wrote: > > > Hey Boyang, > > > > Thanks for the feedback! Please find below my response to your latest > > comments. > > I have modified the KIP wherever possible to address the comm

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

ons 3+ > > when the top version is bumped to 6? > > "fields": [ > > {"name": "Name", "type": "string", "versions": "3+", > > "about": "The name of the feature.&quo

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

ive solution to pass the > feature information through Zookeeper. Is that mentioned in the KIP to > justify why using UpdateMetadata is more favorable? > > 8. I was under the impression that user could configure a range of > supported versions, what's the trade-off for allowing sing

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020, at 19:24, Kowshik Prakasam wrote: > > Hi Colin, > > > > Thanks for the feedback! I've changed the KIP to address your > > suggestions. > > Please find below my explanation. Here is a link to KIP 584: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

-Persistenceoffinalizedfeatureversions Cheers, Kowshik On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:24 PM Kowshik Prakasam wrote: > Hi Colin, > > Thanks for the feedback! I've changed the KIP to address your suggestions. > Please find below my explanation. Here is a link to KIP 584: > https://c

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

gt; > It would be good to describe how the command line tool > kafka.admin.FeatureCommand will work. For example the flags that it will > take and the output that it will generate to STDOUT. > > cheers, > Colin > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020, at 17:08, Kowshik Prakasam wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

pgrade in general. > > One meta comment: it seems the KIP's font is a bit weirdly rendered: > [image: image.png] > Could you try to remove all the rectangle blocks? It looks inconsistent > with most KIPs. > > Thanks, > Boyang > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:14 PM Ko

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

Hi all, Apologies, please ignore the reference to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KIP-584. It was included accidentally. But the link to the KIP is the right one. Cheers, Kowshik On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:08 PM Kowshik Prakasam wrote: > Hi all, > > I've opened KIP-5

[DISCUSS] KIP-584: Versioning scheme for features

Hi all, I've opened KIP-584 which is intended to provide a versioning scheme for features. I'd like to use this thread to discuss the same. I'd appreciate any feedback on this. Here is a link to KIP-584:

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-9755) Implement versioning scheme for features

Kowshik Prakasam created KAFKA-9755: --- Summary: Implement versioning scheme for features Key: KAFKA-9755 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9755 Project: Kafka Issue Type

Re: Hi / Requesting permission to create KIP

Hi Guozhang, Yes, it was granted earlier today. Thank you! Cheers, Kowshik On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:59 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: > Hello Kowshik, > > I saw your username is granted the permission already on wiki. > > Cheers, > Guozhang > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020

Hi / Requesting permission to create KIP

Hi, I'm looking for permission to create a KIP under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals . My username is 'kprakasam'. Could you please grant me access? Cheers, Kowshik

Re: Hi / Requesting permission to create KIP

Thanks a lot, Matthias! Cheers, Kowshik On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:55 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Done. > > On 3/20/20 3:52 PM, Kowshik Prakasam wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > > > I'm looking for permission to create a KIP under > > > https://cwiki.apach

Hi / Requesting permission to create KIP

Hey everyone, I'm looking for permission to create a KIP under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals . My username is 'kprakasam'. If you are an admin, and you are reading this email, could you please grant me access? Thank you. Cheers, Kowshik

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-9715) TransactionStateManager: Eliminate unused reference to interBrokerProtocolVersion

Kowshik Prakasam created KAFKA-9715: --- Summary: TransactionStateManager: Eliminate unused reference to interBrokerProtocolVersion Key: KAFKA-9715 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9715

<    1   2