Thanks Bill!
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: Bill Bejeck
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 6:44:17 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-462 : Use local thread id for KStreams
Thanks for the KIP Boyang. I have no addi
54 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-462 : Use local thread id for KStreams
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Guozhang
>
> On 2019/04/26 07:42:12, "Matthias J. Sax" wrote:
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > I agree that the change
Thank you Guozhang!
From: Guozhang Wang
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 3:54 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-462 : Use local thread id for KStreams
+1 (binding)
Guozhang
On 2019/04/26 07:42:12, "Matthias J. Sax" wrote:
> Thank
+1 (binding)
Guozhang
On 2019/04/26 07:42:12, "Matthias J. Sax" wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> I agree that the change makes sense, and not only for the static group
> membership case.
>
> For example, if a user `closes()` a `KafkaStreams` client and creates a
> new one (for example to
Thank you Sophie! Added the case Matthias described in the Compatibility
session.
From: Sophie Blee-Goldman
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 1:30 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-462 : Use local thread id for KStreams
Hey Boyang,
I think
> expected
> > outcome if they choose to set same client.ids for different Streams
> client.
> >
> >
> > Otherwise, I've no further comments.
> >
> > Guozhang
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:42 PM Boyang Chen wrote:
> >
> &
P.
Boyang
From: Bruno Cadonna
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 4:15 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] KIP-462 : Use local thread id for KStreams
Hi Guozhang,
What do you mean exactly with "throttling purposes"?
@Boyang: Thank you for t
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:42 PM Boyang Chen wrote:
>
> > FYI
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Boyang Chen
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 4:32 AM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DI
comments.
Guozhang
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:42 PM Boyang Chen wrote:
> FYI
>
>
>
> From: Boyang Chen
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 4:32 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-462 : Use local thread id for K
Could we get more discussions on this thread?
Boyang
From: Boyang Chen
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 10:51 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-462 : Use local thread id for KStreams
Thanks for the explanation Matthias! Will enhance the KIP
Thanks for the explanation Matthias! Will enhance the KIP motivation by your
example.
From: Matthias J. Sax
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 3:42 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-462 : Use local thread id for KStreams
Thanks for the KIP!
I
Thanks for the KIP!
I agree that the change makes sense, and not only for the static group
membership case.
For example, if a user `closes()` a `KafkaStreams` client and creates a
new one (for example to recover failed threads), while the JVM is still
running, it is more intuitive that the
Hey friends,
I would like to start discussion for a very small KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-462%3A+Use+local+thread+id+for+KStreams
it is trying to avoid sharing thread-id increment between multiple stream
instances configured in one JVM. This is an important fix
13 matches
Mail list logo
