> should
> > > > > > > > > > also extend the FindCoordinator API to support resolving
> > multiple
> > > > > > > > > > groups as well. This would make the implementation in the
> > admin
> > > > > >
t; > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > David
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:13 AM Rajini Sivaram <
> > > > > > > rajinisiva...@gmail.com
> > &g
t; >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, this is a useful addition for admin use
&
if we want to get this
> > > > into
> > > > > > 2.8.0.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> &
want to get this
> > > into
> > > > > 2.8.0.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rajini
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Ismael, that's a lot better. I've updated the KIP with
> > this
> > > > > > > behaviour instead.
> > > > > > >
>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:42 AM Ismael Juma
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Thomas. One question below:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Should an Admin client with this new functionality
with this new functionality be used
> against
> > an
> > > > old
> > > > > > > broker that cannot handle these requests then the methods will
> > throw
> > > > > > > UnsupportedVersionException as per the usual pattern.
>
an Admin client with this new functionality be used against
> an
> > > old
> > > > > > broker that cannot handle these requests then the methods will
> throw
> > > > > > UnsupportedVersionException as per the usual pattern.
> > > > >
> >
> > > > Did we consider automatically falling back to the single group id
> > request
> > > > if the more efficient one is not supported?
> > > >
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:34 AM Thomas Scott
nException as per the usual pattern.
> > >
> > >
> > > Did we consider automatically falling back to the single group id
> request
> > > if the more efficient one is not supported?
> > >
> > > Ismael
> > >
> > > On Mon, J
; >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:34 AM Thomas Scott wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm starting this thread to discuss KIP-709 to extend OffsetFetch
> > requests
> > > to accept multiple group ids. Please check out the KIP here:
> &g
, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:34 AM Thomas Scott wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm starting this thread to discuss KIP-709 to extend OffsetFetch
> requests
> > to accept multiple group ids. Please check out the KIP here:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pa
g back to the single group id request
if the more efficient one is not supported?
Ismael
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:34 AM Thomas Scott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting this thread to discuss KIP-709 to extend OffsetFetch requests
> to accept multiple group ids. Please check out the K
Hi,
I'm starting this thread to discuss KIP-709 to extend OffsetFetch requests
to accept multiple group ids. Please check out the KIP here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=173084258
Any comments much appreciated.
thanks,
Tom
15 matches
Mail list logo
