That's correct.
David
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 2:11 AM José Armando García Sancio
wrote:
>
> David Jacot wrote:
> > At the moment, the KIP stipulates that the broker remains in
> > InControlledShutdown state until it is re-registered with a new
> > incarnation id. This implies that a broker can
David Jacot wrote:
> At the moment, the KIP stipulates that the broker remains in
> InControlledShutdown state until it is re-registered with a new
> incarnation id. This implies that a broker can be both fenced and in
> controlled shutdown state. We could make them mutually exclusive but I
>
Good point about the unclean election behavior. I agree we wouldn't want to
elect a replica was on a shutting down broker.
> Right. There is a note about this in the Compatibility section.
Thanks :) I missed that
-David
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:19 PM David Jacot
wrote:
> Thanks for your
Thanks for your feedback, David. Please find my answers below.
> When an unclean election is performed, I'm assuming we will ignore the two
new invariants proposed in the KIP? If so, maybe we should clarify that.
I am not sure about this. What's the point of electing a broker which
is fenced or
David, thanks for the KIP!
When an unclean election is performed, I'm assuming we will ignore the two
new invariants proposed in the KIP? If so, maybe we should clarify that.
I understand the use case of persisting the in-controller-shutdown state
for controller failover, but are we planning on
Hi José,
At the moment, the KIP stipulates that the broker remains in
InControlledShutdown state until it is re-registered with a new
incarnation id. This implies that a broker can be both fenced and in
controlled shutdown state. We could make them mutually exclusive but I
think that there is
Thanks for the updates to the KIP.
I like enumerating invariants. Is it safe to say that if
`InControlledShutdown` is true then `Fenced` must be false.
Hi Ismael,
That's the plan. I just noticed that I forgot to change the version of
the field in the AlterPartitionResponse. Let me fix that.
Thanks,
David
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:40 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> If you are adding topic IDs, should we remove topic names?
>
> Ismael
>
Hi David,
If you are adding topic IDs, should we remove topic names?
Ismael
On Tue, May 31, 2022, 6:36 AM David Jacot
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> I just updated the KIP as follows:
> * I propose to add a `TopicId` field at the same time while we are bumping
> the
Hi all,
Thanks for your feedback.
I just updated the KIP as follows:
* I propose to add a `TopicId` field at the same time while we are bumping
the AlterPartition API version.
* I propose to add the `InShuttingDown` field to the registration records to
track if a broker is in controlled
Hi David,
Thanks for the KIP. In the "Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration
Plan", you have:
> The change is backward compatible.
I assume that we don't need to increase the metadata.version/IBP for
AlterPartition because AlterPartitionManager uses ApiVersions for that
channel. Should we
Hi David,
Thanks for the KIP. LGTM!
best,
Colin
On Wed, May 18, 2022, at 08:55, David Jacot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created a small KIP to strengthen the AlterPartition API in KRaft mode:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/phmhD
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Best,
> David
Hi Artem,
In ZK mode, the concept of fenced replicas does not exist -- brokers are either
in the cluster or out, and if they're out, we scrub all information about them
from the metadata. (With the exception of replica sets they are in.)
best,
Colin
On Fri, May 20, 2022, at 10:17, Artem
The KIP LGTM. My only question is why it's an issue with KRaft -- looks
like ZK would have the same issue?
-Artem
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 8:51 AM David Jacot
wrote:
> This KIP is pretty straight forward. I will start a vote on Monday
> if no one objects.
>
> Best,
> David
>
> On Wed, May 18,
This KIP is pretty straight forward. I will start a vote on Monday
if no one objects.
Best,
David
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 5:55 PM David Jacot wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I created a small KIP to strengthen the AlterPartition API in KRaft mode:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/phmhD
>
> Let me
Hi,
I created a small KIP to strengthen the AlterPartition API in KRaft mode:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/phmhD
Let me know what you think.
Best,
David
16 matches
Mail list logo
