Starting a new thread here
https://lists.apache.org/thread/895pgb85l08g2l63k99cw5dt2qpjkxb9
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 1:05 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> Also, it looks like someone already claimed KIP-865, so I'd suggest grabbing
> a new number. :)
>
> Colin
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, at 09:38, Colin
Also, it looks like someone already claimed KIP-865, so I'd suggest grabbing a
new number. :)
Colin
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, at 09:38, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Thanks for this KIP, David!
>
> In the "motivation" section, it might help to give a concrete example
> of an operation we want to be atomic.
Hello.
Sorry, but it seems we should fix KIP numbering.
KIP-865 [1] is another KIP :).
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-865%3A+Support+--bootstrap-server+in+kafka-streams-application-reset
> 9 сент. 2022 г., в 19:38, Colin McCabe написал(а):
>
> Thanks for this KIP, D
Thanks for this KIP, David!
In the "motivation" section, it might help to give a concrete example of an
operation we want to be atomic. My favorite one is probably CreateTopics since
it's easy to see that we want to create all of a topic or none of it, and a
topic could be a potentially unbound
Hey folks, I'd like to start a discussion on the idea of adding
transactions in the KRaft controller. This will allow us to overcome
the current limitation of atomic batch sizes in Raft which lets us do
things like create topics with a huge number of partitions.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
