Hi Guozhang,
Thanks for your comments.
1) Yes, ordering cannot be guaranteed in PKG. In general, algorithms that
use PGK should compute commutative and associative functions of the input.
If you need strict ordering (i.e., the function is not commutative) within
a partition, use KG.
2) I am not
I see, thanks for the clarification.
Guozhang
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales
g...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Guozhang,
Thanks for your comments.
1) Yes, ordering cannot be guaranteed in PKG. In general, algorithms that
use PGK should compute commutative and
Gianmarco,
I browse through your paper (congrats for the ICDE publication BTW!), and
here are some questions / comments on the algorithm:
1. One motivation of enabling key-based partitioned in Kafka is to achieve
per-key ordering, i.e. with all messages with the same key sent to the same
Hi Jay,
Thanks, that sounds a necessary step. I guess I expected something like
that to be already there, at least internally.
I created KAFKA-2092 to track the PKG integration.
Cheers,
--
Gianmarco
On 4 April 2015 at 23:50, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I think the first
Hey guys,
I think the first step here would be to expose a partitioner interface for
the new producer that would make it easy to plug in these different
strategies. I filed a JIRA for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2091
-Jay
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Harsha
Hi,
We have recently studied the problem of load balancing in distributed
stream processing systems such as Samza [1].
In particular, we focused on what happens when the key distribution of the
stream is skewed when using key grouping.
We developed a new stream partitioning scheme (which we call
Gianmarco,
I am coming from storm community. I think PKG is a very
interesting and we can provide an implementation of Partitioner for PKG. Can
you open a JIRA for this.
--
Harsha
Sent with Airmail
On April 3, 2015 at 4:49:15 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales
