@randall it's more of a "safety net" and making sure an application runs
against a topic that's properly configured or crashes. Not absolutely
needed
On Mon., 27 Aug. 2018, 6:04 pm McCaig, Rhys,
wrote:
> Randall,
>
> This KIP looks great to me. As for _updating_ topic configs - It’s a nice
> to
Randall,
This KIP looks great to me. As for _updating_ topic configs - It’s a nice to
have but certainly something that I could live without in order to get this KIP
implemented. (Its not something I would use in my current setup but I can see
some cases where it could be part of the workflow f