Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-280: Enhanced log compaction

2019-12-18 Thread Guozhang Wang
gt; Senthil > > -Original Message- > From: radai > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 11:40 AM > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-280: Enhanced log compaction > > may I suggest that if, under "header" strategy, multiple records a

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-280: Enhanced log compaction

2019-12-16 Thread Senthilnathan Muthusamy
of the current KIP... Appreciate your valuable feedback! Regards, Senthil -Original Message- From: radai Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 11:40 AM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-280: Enhanced log compaction may I suggest that if, under "header"

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-280: Enhanced log compaction

2019-12-12 Thread radai
cord for non-offset based compaction strategy). Please review > and let me know if you have any other feedback. > > Regards, > Senthil > > -Original Message- > From: Jun Rao > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 4:36 PM > To: dev > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DI

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-280: Enhanced log compaction

2019-11-26 Thread Senthilnathan Muthusamy
: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 4:36 PM To: dev Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-280: Enhanced log compaction Hi, Senthil, Sorry for the delay. 51. It seems that we can just remove the last record from the batch, but keeps the batch during compaction. The batch level metadata is enough