Github user becketqin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/29
@ijuma Thanks for the review. Merged to the asf-site.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ijuma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/29
LGTM, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user becketqin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/29
@ijuma Does the updated page look good to you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user becketqin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/29
@ijuma That's fair. I updated the page. The thing I found confusing is that
we have documentation in three places: 1) Kafka code repo 2) kafka-site repo 3)
some documentation are just a wiki
Github user ijuma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/29
@becketqin, it's just that we point to the Apache git repo (which is the
source repository) a few lines above for the code repo. We should probably be
consistent and mention GitHub for both if we
Github user becketqin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/29
@ijuma The github site has stated that it is mirrored from the Apache repo.
I added the link anyways.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ijuma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/29
Good catch, you probably want to include that link to that Apache Git repo
as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
