On 3/24/15, 1:34 PM, Guozhang Wang wangg...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, let's just start a new thread for this.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Joel Koshy jjkosh...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, since there are already votes on this and the KIP has
changed a bit we should cancel this and start a
Push up the thread for voting after discussion on the KIP hangout.
On 3/19/15, 9:03 PM, Jiangjie Qin j...@linkedin.com wrote:
We had some additional discussions on the discussion thread. Pushing up
this thread to resume voting.
On 3/11/15, 8:47 PM, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah
Actually, since there are already votes on this and the KIP has
changed a bit we should cancel this and start a new thread.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Jiangjie Qin
j...@linkedin.com.invalid wrote:
Push up the thread for voting after discussion on the KIP hangout.
On 3/19/15, 9:03 PM,
+1, let's just start a new thread for this.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Joel Koshy jjkosh...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, since there are already votes on this and the KIP has
changed a bit we should cancel this and start a new thread.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Jiangjie Qin
We had some additional discussions on the discussion thread. Pushing up
this thread to resume voting.
On 3/11/15, 8:47 PM, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah guys, I'd like to second that. I'd really really love to get the
quality of these to the point where we could broadly solicit user
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Jiangjie Qin j...@linkedin.com.invalid
wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-15+-+Add+a+close+method+with+a+timeout+in+the+producer
--
-- Guozhang
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-15+-+Add+a+close+method+with+a+timeout+in+the+producer
Could the KIP confluence please have updated the discussion thread link,
thanks... could you also remove the template boilerplate at the top *This
page is meant as a template ..* so we can capture it for the release
cleanly.
Also I don't really/fully understand how this is different than
Yeah guys, I'd like to second that. I'd really really love to get the
quality of these to the point where we could broadly solicit user input and
use them as a permanent document of the alternatives and rationale.
I know it is a little painful to have process, but I think we all saw what
happened
