hias,
>>>
>>> Just clarifying a meta question along side with my vote: we still need to
>>> understand the overhead of the `To` objects during run time to determine
>>> whether we would use it in the final proposal or using overloading
>>> f
Feb 11, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:31 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for the KIP, +1 for me.
> >>
t;>
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:31 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the KIP, +1 for me.
>>>
>>> -Bill
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:45 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>&g
te:
>>
>> > Thanks Matthias, +1
>> >
>> > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 at 02:42 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > > Original message From: "Matthias J. Sax" <
>> > > matth.
2018 at 02:42 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > > Original message From: "Matthias J. Sax" <
> > > matth...@confluent.io> Date: 2/8/18 6:05 PM (GMT-08:00) To:
> > > dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: [V
-From: "Matthias J. Sax" <
> > matth...@confluent.io> Date: 2/8/18 6:05 PM (GMT-08:00) To:
> > dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] KIP-251: Allow timestamp
> > manipulation in Processor API
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to start the vote for KIP-251:
> >
&g
Thanks Matthias, +1
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 at 02:42 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
> Original message From: "Matthias J. Sax" <
> matth...@confluent.io> Date: 2/8/18 6:05 PM (GMT-08:00) To:
> dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] KIP-2
+1
Original message From: "Matthias J. Sax"
<matth...@confluent.io> Date: 2/8/18 6:05 PM (GMT-08:00) To:
dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] KIP-251: Allow timestamp manipulation in
Processor API
Hi,
I want to start the vote for KIP-251:
https://cwiki.apach
Hi,
I want to start the vote for KIP-251:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-251%3A+Allow+timestamp+manipulation+in+Processor+API
-Matthias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
