Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Thanks for the update, Mickael. Changes look good to me. On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Mickael Maison wrote: > Quick update: > While implementing the KIP, we made a couple of changes: > - Use regular fields instead of flexible fields. We had to bump the > protocol version to detect

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Quick update: While implementing the KIP, we made a couple of changes: - Use regular fields instead of flexible fields. We had to bump the protocol version to detect compatibility so flexible fields were not helping much for this low volume API. - If no states are specified in the request, return

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Hi all, The vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Gwen, Colin and Rajini) and 5 non-binding votes (Kevin, Ryanne, Dongjin, Tom and David). Thanks everybody On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:09 AM Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP, Mickael! > > Regards, > > Rajini > > > On

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Mickael! Regards, Rajini On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:06 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > Thanks, Mickael. +1 (binding) > > best, > Colin > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, at 02:05, Mickael Maison wrote: > > Thanks David and Gwen for the votes > > Colin, I believe I've

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Thanks, Mickael. +1 (binding) best, Colin On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, at 02:05, Mickael Maison wrote: > Thanks David and Gwen for the votes > Colin, I believe I've answered all your questions, can you take another look? > > So far we have 1 binding and 5 non binding votes. > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Thanks David and Gwen for the votes Colin, I believe I've answered all your questions, can you take another look? So far we have 1 binding and 5 non binding votes. On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Gwen Shapira wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Gwen Shapira > Engineering Manager | Confluent >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

+1 (binding) Gwen Shapira Engineering Manager | Confluent 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap Follow us: Twitter | blog On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 8:32 AM, David Jacot < dja...@confluent.io > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > > > David > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! David On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > Hi Mickael, > > Thanks for the KIP. I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well. > > best, > Colin > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote: > > Hi Manikumar, > > > > I

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Hi Mickael, Thanks for the KIP. I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well. best, Colin On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote: > Hi Manikumar, > > I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread. > Thanks > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Hi Manikumar, I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread. Thanks On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar wrote: > > Hi Mickael, > > Thanks for the KIP. Can you respond to the comments from David on discuss > thread? > > Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Hi Mickael, Thanks for the KIP. Can you respond to the comments from David on discuss thread? Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP. On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:15 PM Dongjin Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 7:16 PM Mickael Maison > wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > With 2.5.0 approaching, bumping this thread once more as feedback or > > votes would be nice. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 7:16 PM Mickael Maison wrote: > Hi all. > > With 2.5.0 approaching, bumping this thread once more as feedback or > votes would be nice. > > Thanks > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ryanne Dolan > wrote: > > > > +1 non-binding, thx > > > > On Thu, Dec

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Hi all. With 2.5.0 approaching, bumping this thread once more as feedback or votes would be nice. Thanks On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ryanne Dolan wrote: > > +1 non-binding, thx > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:09 AM Mickael Maison > wrote: > > > Bumping this thread > > > > On Tue, Nov 19,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

+1 non-binding, thx On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:09 AM Mickael Maison wrote: > Bumping this thread > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:27 AM Kevin Lu wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > I can see this being useful. Thanks for the KIP! > > > > Regards, > > Kevin > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:09

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Bumping this thread On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:27 AM Kevin Lu wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > I can see this being useful. Thanks for the KIP! > > Regards, > Kevin > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:09 AM Mickael Maison > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

+1 (non-binding) I can see this being useful. Thanks for the KIP! Regards, Kevin On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:09 AM Mickael Maison wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state

[VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

Hi all, I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state Thanks