Hi all,
I updated the KIP with more details on per-IP connection rate limiting.
Notable changes are the addition of metrics tracking per-IP connection rate
acceptance and IP connection rate limiting throttling.
In addition, I fleshed out details around the API we will use to describe and
alter
Hi David,
You are right, using a token bucket exposes the metric for the number of
remaining tokens in the bucket. Since we also want to evaluate using a
token bucket for bandwidth & request throttling, it would be better to have
this discussion separately in a separate KIP. This KIP does not
Hi Anna,
Thanks for the update.
If you use Token Bucket, it will expose another metric which reports the
number of remaining tokens in the bucket, in addition to the current rate
metric. It would be great to add it in the metrics section of the KIP as
well
for completeness.
Best,
David
On Tue,
Hi All,
I wanted to let everyone know that we would like to make the following
changes to the KIP:
1.
Expose connection acceptance rate metrics (broker-wide and per-listener)
and per-listener average throttle time metrics for better observability and
debugging.
2.
KIP-599
The vote for KIP-612 has passed with 3 binding and 3 non-binding +1s, and
no objections.
Thanks everyone for reviews and feedback,
Anna
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 2:41 AM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP, Anna!
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP, Anna!
Regards,
Rajini
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 9:32 AM Alexandre Dupriez <
alexandre.dupr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thank you for the KIP!
>
>
> Le mar. 19 mai 2020 à 07:57, David Jacot a écrit :
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks for
+1 (non-binding)
Thank you for the KIP!
Le mar. 19 mai 2020 à 07:57, David Jacot a écrit :
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP, Anna!
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 7:12 AM Satish Duggana
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > Thanks Anna for the nice feature to control the connection
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP, Anna!
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 7:12 AM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Thanks Anna for the nice feature to control the connection creation rate
> from the clients.
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:16 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Anna for the nice feature to control the connection creation rate
from the clients.
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:16 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thank you for driving this, Anna
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 4:55 PM Anna Povzner wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I
+1 (binding)
Thank you for driving this, Anna
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 4:55 PM Anna Povzner wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to start the vote on KIP-612: Ability to limit connection
> creation rate on brokers.
>
> For reference, here is the KIP wiki:
>
>
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 18 2020 at 4:54 PM, Anna Povzner < a...@confluent.io > wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I would like to start the vote on KIP-612: Ability to limit connection
> creation rate on brokers.
>
>
>
> For reference, here is the KIP wiki:
>
Hi All,
I would like to start the vote on KIP-612: Ability to limit connection
creation rate on brokers.
For reference, here is the KIP wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-612%3A+Ability+to+Limit+Connection+Creation+Rate+on+Brokers
And discussion thread:
12 matches
Mail list logo
