Hi all,
Some context about this thread:
In KIP-679, we set the default producer config with
`enable.idempotence=true` and `acks=all` in v3.0.0. Here's the discussion
and vote thread link:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/hfwwpyl3kyj381v45dfnyrw9ddrkyc29
Thanks you all for discussing and voting on this KIP. Now it has been approved
with 4 binding votes.
Best, - Cheng
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 12:52 AM, David Jacot wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP, Cheng!
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
>
>> Thanks, +1
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP, Cheng!
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks, +1 (binding).
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:40 PM Cheng Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi Ismael,
> >
> > Yes. Add deprecation warning for `IDEMPOTENT_WRITE` in 3.0 makes sense.
> > I’ve updated the KIP’s
Thanks, +1 (binding).
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:40 PM Cheng Tan wrote:
> Hi Ismael,
>
> Yes. Add deprecation warning for `IDEMPOTENT_WRITE` in 3.0 makes sense.
> I’ve updated the KIP’s “DEMPOTENT_WRITE Deprecation” section to reflect
> your suggestion. Please let me know if you have more
Hi Ismael,
Yes. Add deprecation warning for `IDEMPOTENT_WRITE` in 3.0 makes sense. I’ve
updated the KIP’s “DEMPOTENT_WRITE Deprecation” section to reflect your
suggestion. Please let me know if you have more suggestions. Thanks.
Best, - Cheng Tan
> On Dec 7, 2020, at 6:42 AM, Ismael Juma
Thanks for the KIP Cheng. One suggestion: should we add the `kafka-acls`
deprecation warnings for `IDEMPOTENT_WRITE` in 3.0? That would give time
for authorizer implementations to be updated.
Ismael
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:00 AM Cheng Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m proposing a new KIP for
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP, Cheng!
Regards,
Rajini
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 6:14 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 (binding). Awesome suggestion, Cheng.
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:00 AM Cheng Tan wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I’m proposing a new KIP for enabling the strongest delivery
+1 (binding). Awesome suggestion, Cheng.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:00 AM Cheng Tan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’m proposing a new KIP for enabling the strongest delivery guarantee by
> default. Today Kafka support EOS and N-1 concurrent failure tolerance but the
> default settings haven’t bring
Hi all,
I’m proposing a new KIP for enabling the strongest delivery guarantee by
default. Today Kafka support EOS and N-1 concurrent failure tolerance but the
default settings haven’t bring them out of the box. The proposal changes
include the producer defaults change to `ack=all` and
