Re: 1.0.0 Feature Freeze Update

Sure, we do that for every PR anyway (i.e. we manage risk on a continuous scale - even if it's before the feature freeze). I am happy to cc you on any Core PR that we may consider after the feature freeze. Ismael On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: >

Re: 1.0.0 Feature Freeze Update

Thanks for the reminder Ismael. I think after this Wednesday for KIP-related PRs we need to discuss case-by-case to estimate its impact on regression. Guozhang On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi Guozhang, > > Note that our documentation for the

Re: 1.0.0 Feature Freeze Update

Hi Guozhang, Note that our documentation for the time-based release plan says the following about what happens after the feature freeze: "We will leave another week for "minor" features to get in (see below for definitions), but at this point we will start efforts to stabilize the release branch

1.0.0 Feature Freeze Update

Hello folks, This is a heads up on 1.0.0 progress post the KIP-deadline: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=71764913 In this release we have a total of 33 KIPs either newly adopted or inherited from the previous release. Among them 15 KIPs has been merged to