Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-13 Thread Brian Byrne
Excuse me, that should read "4 binding +1 votes". Brian On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:26 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > With 5 binding +1 votes from Colin McCabe, Gwen Shapira, Manikumar Reddy, > and Jason Gustafson, and 2 non-binding +1 votes from Viktor Somogyi-Vass > and Jose Armando

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-13 Thread Brian Byrne
Hello all, With 5 binding +1 votes from Colin McCabe, Gwen Shapira, Manikumar Reddy, and Jason Gustafson, and 2 non-binding +1 votes from Viktor Somogyi-Vass and Jose Armando Garcia Sancio, the vote passes. Thanks, Brian On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:23 PM Brian Byrne wrote: > > Thanks everyone.

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-08 Thread Brian Byrne
Thanks everyone. Unless there's any additional input or issues raised, I'll close the vote Monday morning approx 10 am PST. Brian On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:32 PM Jason Gustafson wrote: > +1 Looking forward to this. I love the quality-of-life changes. > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:00 PM

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-07 Thread Jason Gustafson
+1 Looking forward to this. I love the quality-of-life changes. On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:00 PM Manikumar wrote: > +1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP. > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thank you. > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-07 Thread Manikumar
+1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP. On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thank you. > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-07 Thread Gwen Shapira
+1 (binding) Thank you. On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > Thanks, > Brian > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-07 Thread Jose Armando Garcia Sancio
Hi Brian, LGTM. +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:28 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding). > > best, > Colin > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 08:41, Brian Byrne wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > > > Thanks, > > Brian

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-07 Thread Colin McCabe
Hi Brian, Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding). best, Colin On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 08:41, Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > Thanks, > Brian > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I'd like to call a vote on

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-07 Thread Brian Byrne
Hello all, Ping. Any further votes or opinions? Thanks, Brian On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > functionality, linked here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw > > Thanks, > Brian >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-11-04 Thread Viktor Somogyi-Vass
No problem :) I also agree that it should be out of scope right now. On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:10 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > Sorry, that should read "Hi Viktor",-C. > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 14:08, Colin McCabe wrote: > > Hi Vikto, > > > > That's an interesting idea. However, I think

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-10-31 Thread Colin McCabe
Sorry, that should read "Hi Viktor",-C. On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 14:08, Colin McCabe wrote: > Hi Vikto, > > That's an interesting idea. However, I think it's better to consider > it outside the context of this KIP. I think one-letter abbreviations > would be controversial, and aren't

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-10-31 Thread Colin McCabe
Hi Vikto, That's an interesting idea. However, I think it's better to consider it outside the context of this KIP. I think one-letter abbreviations would be controversial, and aren't really related to fixing the ZK dependency here. +1 (binding). Thanks, Brian. best, Colin On Thu, Oct 31,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-10-31 Thread Viktor Somogyi-Vass
Hi Brian, I was just asking it because of curiosity although I do think it would be useful but it should be done on all tools to keep them consistent. Perhaps it could be a future consideration. I'm +1 on the KIP (non-binding). Viktor On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:50 PM Brian Byrne wrote: > Hi

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-10-30 Thread Brian Byrne
Hi Viktor, That's a possibility, however there doesn't appear to be precedent for one-letter abbreviations with the Kafka commands, so going with the current flags seemed less controversial. I'm not against it if there's a consensus that adding {-b, -bl, -u, -c, -t} is better, but as of now,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality

2019-10-30 Thread Viktor Somogyi-Vass
Hi Brian, Have you thought about having one letter abbreviations like '-b' for --brokers etc.? Thanks, Viktor On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:39 PM Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > functionality, linked here: