Binding: 3 (John, Gwen, Mickael)
Non-binding: 2 (Dongjin, Brandon)
This KIP is now accepted. Thanks for participating!
Best,
Dongjin
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:52 PM Brandon Brown
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Brandon Brown
> > On Oct 22, 2020, at 5:03 AM, Mickael Maison
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
+1 (non binding)
Brandon Brown
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 5:03 AM, Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
> Thanks
>
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 8:09 AM Dongjin Lee wrote:
>>
>> Binding: 2 (John, Gwen)
>> Non-binding: 1 (Dongjin)
>>
>> We need one more binding now.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dongjin
>>
+1 (binding)
Thanks
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 8:09 AM Dongjin Lee wrote:
>
> Binding: 2 (John, Gwen)
> Non-binding: 1 (Dongjin)
>
> We need one more binding now.
>
> Regards,
> Dongjin
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 3:05 PM Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Makes sense, thank you.
> >
>
Binding: 2 (John, Gwen)
Non-binding: 1 (Dongjin)
We need one more binding now.
Regards,
Dongjin
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 3:05 PM Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Makes sense, thank you.
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 2:50 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > KIP-676 is pretty trivial
+1 (binding)
Makes sense, thank you.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 2:50 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread seem to
> be favourable, so I'd like to start a vote on it.
>
>
>
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
-John
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, at 05:57, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> +1. (Non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Dongjin
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 6:50 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread seem to
> > be
+1. (Non-binding)
Thanks,
Dongjin
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 6:50 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> KIP-676 is pretty trivial and the comments on the discussion thread seem to
> be favourable, so I'd like to start a vote on it.
>
>
>
