Hi there,
Thanks for participating in the discussion and voting.
I'm closing this vote with *three* binding +1 and zero -1 votes.
Binding +1
- Guozhang
- Bruno
- Tom
Non-Binding +1
- Josep
- Luke
- Sagar
I'll submit the PR right away.
Thanks again,
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:14 PM Tom Bentley
+1 (binding).
Thanks Josep!
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:51 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
> Thanks, Josep!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Bruno
>
> On 04.09.21 05:55, Sagar wrote:
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > +1(non-binding)
> >
> > Sagar.
> >
> > On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 at 8:15 AM, Luke Chen wrote:
> >
> >>
Thanks, Josep!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 04.09.21 05:55, Sagar wrote:
Looks good to me.
+1(non-binding)
Sagar.
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 at 8:15 AM, Luke Chen wrote:
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks.
Luke
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:32 AM Guozhang Wang wrote:
Thanks Josep,
Looks good to me.
+1(non-binding)
Sagar.
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 at 8:15 AM, Luke Chen wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks.
> Luke
>
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:32 AM Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > Thanks Josep,
> >
> > Took a look at the KIP, LGTM.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 3,
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks.
Luke
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:32 AM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Thanks Josep,
>
> Took a look at the KIP, LGTM.
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:25 AM Josep Prat
> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Since it's a rather small KIP, I'd like to start a vote for
Thanks Josep,
Took a look at the KIP, LGTM.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:25 AM Josep Prat
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Since it's a rather small KIP, I'd like to start a vote for the KIP-773
> Differentiate consistently metric latency measured in millis and nanos.
> The KIP page The KIP can be found
