Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

Thanks Bill!! Just to summarize: 4 binding +1 (Chris, Mickael, John and Bill), and 1 non-binding +1 (Robert) Many thanks, Jorge. On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 15:56, Bill Bejeck wrote: > Hi Jorge, > > Recasting my vote +1(binding). > > I'm looking forward to this KIP! > > Thanks, > Bill > > On Fri,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

Hi Jorge, Recasting my vote +1(binding). I'm looking forward to this KIP! Thanks, Bill On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:11 AM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya < quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm pleased to announce that the KIP-821 has been accepted with 3 binding > votes from Chris,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

Hi all, I'm pleased to announce that the KIP-821 has been accepted with 3 binding votes from Chris, John, Mickael, 1 non-binding vote by Robert, and 1 binding vote to be confirmed by Bill. Thank you all for your great feedback and contribution to the KIP! Cheers, Jorge. On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at

Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:42 PM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to bump this vote thread. Currently it's missing 1 +1 binding vote > to pass (2 +1 binding, 1 +1 non-binding). > > There has been additional discussions to consider

Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

Hi there, Bumping this thread for visibility. Cheers, Jorge On Wed, 14 Sep 2022, 19:23 John Roesler, wrote: > Thanks, all! > > I've reviewed the current state of the KIP, and I'm still +1 (binding). > > Thanks, > -John > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2022, at 12:03, Chris Egerton wrote: > > +1 (binding).

Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

Thanks, all! I've reviewed the current state of the KIP, and I'm still +1 (binding). Thanks, -John On Fri, Sep 2, 2022, at 12:03, Chris Egerton wrote: > +1 (binding). Thanks Jorge, great stuff! > > We should probably verify with the people that have already cast +1 votes > that they're still on

RE: Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

+1 (binding). Thanks Jorge, great stuff! We should probably verify with the people that have already cast +1 votes that they're still on board, since the design has shifted a bit since the last vote was casted. On 2022/06/28 20:42:14 Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd

Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

Hi everyone, I'd like to bump this vote thread. Currently it's missing 1 +1 binding vote to pass (2 +1 binding, 1 +1 non-binding). There has been additional discussions to consider array access and deep-scan (similar to JsonPath) but hasn't been included as part of this KIP. The only minor

Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

Thanks for the KIP, Jorge. This looks like a great addition to Kafka Connect. +1(binding) -Bill On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 6:41 PM John Roesler wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Jorge! > > I’ve just looked over the KIP, and it looks good to me. > > I’m +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > John > > On Thu, Apr

Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

Thanks for the KIP, Jorge! I’ve just looked over the KIP, and it looks good to me. I’m +1 (binding) Thanks, John On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, at 09:10, Chris Egerton wrote: > This is a worthwhile addition to the SMTs that ship out of the box with > Kafka Connect. +1 non-binding > > On Thu, Apr 21,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-821: Connect Transforms support for nested structures

This is a worthwhile addition to the SMTs that ship out of the box with Kafka Connect. +1 non-binding On Thu, Apr 21, 2022, 09:51 Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya < quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-821: > >