I think that if this is introduced (and perhaps even if it is not) we need
a clear ACL evaluation process.
I know we have both allow and deny, and that deny takes precedence over
allow.
But let's consider two scenarios
1. Unintended access.
Let's assume we start with the 6 topics Murali used
Hello,
I'd like to propose a suggestion to our resource patterns in Kafka ACLs.
Currently, when adding new ACLs in Kafka, we have two types of resource
patterns for topics:
- LITERAL
- PREFIXED
However, when it comes to listing or removing ACLs, we have a couple more
options:
- MATCH
