I took a pass on these and tried to update our summary table based on
Gwen's summary. There are a couple that are just waiting on the owner to
hold their vote.
There are a number that are still very sparse on detail. I really want to
encourage everyone to take a look at the python PEPs, I think
Thanks Gwen!
One thing that I forgot to mention during the meeting is that we need to
create a KIP for another producer API change also (KAFKA-1660). The code is
almost ready and we just need to figure out some details about interacting
with concurrent flush() calls.
Guozhang
On Tue, Mar 3,
Hi,
I put together a (very) short summary of the discussion and decisions:
KIPs:
We reviewed the list of KIPs posted here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
* KIP-2: Ready for formal vote
* KIP-3: Discussion closed. There’s a new KIP (14) for
Thanks Gwen!
-Jay
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi,
I put together a (very) short summary of the discussion and decisions:
KIPs:
We reviewed the list of KIPs posted here:
Thanks Gwen!
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:12:24PM -0800, Gwen Shapira wrote:
Hi,
I put together a (very) short summary of the discussion and decisions:
KIPs:
We reviewed the list of KIPs posted here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
* KIP-2: