Hi Tom.
Good timing for your question.
I'll be revisiting KIP-158 and I'll bring an updated proposal for
discussion this quarter.
As always, it'll be ideal to strike a good balance between flexibility and
conciseness on what we expose to Connect's developers and operators.
Stay tuned.
Hey Tom. The approach I ended up taking with MM2 is to construct an
AdminClient based on properties in the connector config, which requires
that such properties exist in two places (the worker config and the
connector config). I still believe that, ideally, a connector implementer
should have
Hi,
KIP-158 proposed a way to allow source connectors a way to configure their
topics prior to creation. This was discussed, but the vote didn't get
enough commiter votes at the time (though I think a couple of the +1s came
from people who are now committers).
Meanwhile in KIP-382 (MirrorMaker
