Re: [VOTE] KIP-504 - Add new Java Authorizer Interface

The vote has passed with 4 binding (Colin, Manikumar, Harsha, Rajini) and 3 non-binding (Ron, Mickael, David) votes. Many thanks to everyone for the feedback and votes. I will update the KIP page and submit PRs. Regards, Rajini On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:26 AM David Jacot wrote: > +1

Jenkins build is back to normal : kafka-trunk-jdk11 #777

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : kafka-trunk-jdk8 #3872

See

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-8838) Allow consumer group tool to work with non-existing consumer groups

Patrik Kleindl created KAFKA-8838: - Summary: Allow consumer group tool to work with non-existing consumer groups Key: KAFKA-8838 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8838 Project: Kafka

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-8579) Expose RocksDB Metrics to JMX

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Cadonna resolved KAFKA-8579. -- Resolution: Fixed > Expose RocksDB Metrics to JMX > - > >

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk11 #778

See Changes: [wangguoz] MINOR: fix ProduceBenchWorker not to fail on final produce (#7254) -- [...truncated 2.85 MB...]

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-448: Add State Stores Unit Test Support to Kafka Streams Test Utils

Hi All, I have finally worked on this KIP again and want to discuss with you all before this KIP goes dormant. Recap: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6460 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-448%3A+Add+State+Stores+Unit+Test+Support+to+Kafka+Streams+Test+Utils I

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-8841) Optimize Partition.maybeIncrementLeaderHW

Jason Gustafson created KAFKA-8841: -- Summary: Optimize Partition.maybeIncrementLeaderHW Key: KAFKA-8841 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8841 Project: Kafka Issue Type:

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-482: The Kafka Protocol should Support Optional Fields

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, at 05:23, Magnus Edenhill wrote: > Great KIP as always, Colin! > > Some comments: > > > If the flexible versions are not specified, it is assumed that all > versions are flexible. > > This is ambiguous, if a protocol-generator is pointed to an older Kafka > protocol

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-8839) Improve logging in Kafka Streams around debugging task lifecycle

Vinoth Chandar created KAFKA-8839: - Summary: Improve logging in Kafka Streams around debugging task lifecycle Key: KAFKA-8839 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8839 Project: Kafka

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-8494) Refactor Consumer#StickyAssignor and add CooperativeStickyAssignor (part 4)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sophie Blee-Goldman resolved KAFKA-8494. Resolution: Fixed > Refactor Consumer#StickyAssignor and add

Re: [ DISCUSS ] KIP-512:Adding headers to RecordMetaData

Hi Gwen/Team Can you please review the KIP. Hope we have clarified the question you have regarding proposal. Thanks Renuka M On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 3:35 PM Renuka M wrote: > Hi Eric, > > We thought about that but we didn't find the strong enough reason for > having record itself in

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-8840) Fix bug where ClientCompatibilityFeaturesTest fails when running multiple iterations

Colin P. McCabe created KAFKA-8840: -- Summary: Fix bug where ClientCompatibilityFeaturesTest fails when running multiple iterations Key: KAFKA-8840 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8840

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-507: Securing Internal Connect REST Endpoints

Hi Chris, Thanks a lot for the KIP. This will certainly be a useful feature. I would have preferred to use the topic approach as well but I also understand your point of view about the operational complexity for upgrades. If not with this KIP, I would certainly want to go that route at some point

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-507: Securing Internal Connect REST Endpoints

Thanks for the KIP Chris! This proposal will fill a gap in Kafka Connect deployments and will strengthen their production readiness in even more diverse environments, in which current workarounds are less practical. I've read the discussions regarding why the rebalancing protocol is used here

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-8837) Several integration tests incorrectly use verifyNonDaemonThreadsStatus

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ismael Juma resolved KAFKA-8837. Fix Version/s: 2.4.0 Resolution: Fixed > Several integration tests incorrectly use

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-360: Improve handling of unknown producer

Makes sense, thanks! On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:38 AM Jason Gustafson wrote: > Hi Guozhang, > > 1. I think there are still some retriable errors that could affect the > transaction APIs. For example, COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS. > 2. Yes, this is right. The only fatal error is when the

Re: European Commission Hackathon - 5/6 October 2019 - registration

Thank you, Denis, for sharing information about Hackaton. I'm trying to register for the event. However, I get only a white window. Could you please say if the registration form is working? [image: Screenshot from 2019-08-27 18-37-09.png] On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:16 PM Denis Prost wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-360: Improve handling of unknown producer

Hi Guozhang, 1. I think there are still some retriable errors that could affect the transaction APIs. For example, COORDINATOR_LOAD_IN_PROGRESS. 2. Yes, this is right. The only fatal error is when the producer has been fenced by another instance. Thanks, Jason On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:05 PM

European Commission Hackathon - 5/6 October 2019 - registration

Dear Kafka developer community As you may know the European Commission is an active user and supporter of open source and its associated ecosystem. An example of this support is the successful EU-FOSSA programme, which is helping to improve the security of key open source software. Due to

request for permission to create KIP

Hey, I want to create a KIP for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7711 to initiate discussion. Can someone grant me permission? Thanks, Kun

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.4.0 release

Hi all, I put together a draft release plan with Oct 2019 as the release month and a list of KIPs that have already been voted: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=125307901 Here are the dates: 1) KIP Freeze: Sep 25, 2019 (A KIP must be accepted by this date in