Maciej BryĆski created KAFKA-6626:
-
Summary: Performance bottleneck in Kafka Connect sendRecords
Key: KAFKA-6626
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6626
Project: Kafka
Issue Typ
barry010 created KAFKA-6625:
---
Summary: kafka offset reset when I upgrade kafka from 0.11.0 to
1.0.0 version
Key: KAFKA-6625
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6625
Project: Kafka
Iss
+1
Original message From: Guozhang Wang
Date: 3/7/18 9:17 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE]
KIP-186: Increase offsets retention default to 7 days
+1 (binding).
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:04 PM, James Cheng wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -James
>
> >
+1 (binding).
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:04 PM, James Cheng wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -James
>
> > On Mar 7, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I think we can improve this in the future, but this simple change will
> > avoid a lot of pain. Thanks for reviving it Ewen.
> >
>
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:03 PM, John Roesler wrote:
> Thanks Ted,
>
> Sure thing; I updated the example code in the KIP with a little snippet.
>
> -John
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:18 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> See if you can add punctuator into the sample code.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar
Dear Kafka community,
I am proposing KIP-267 to augment the public Streams test utils API.
The goal is to simplify testing of Kafka Streams applications.
Please find details in the
wiki:https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-267%3A+Add+Processor+Unit+Test+Support+to+Kafka+Streams+T
Jun Rao created KAFKA-6624:
--
Summary: log segment deletion could cause a disk to be marked
offline incorrectly
Key: KAFKA-6624
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6624
Project: Kafka
I
Jason Gustafson created KAFKA-6623:
--
Summary: Consider renaming inefficient RecordBatch operations
Key: KAFKA-6623
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6623
Project: Kafka
Issue
+1 (non-binding)
-James
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I think we can improve this in the future, but this simple change will
> avoid a lot of pain. Thanks for reviving it Ewen.
>
> -Jay
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
> wrote:
>
>> I'd
radai rosenblatt created KAFKA-6622:
---
Summary: GroupMetadataManager.loadGroupsAndOffsets decompresses
record batch needlessly
Key: KAFKA-6622
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6622
Pr
Jun,
thanks for your comment. This should actually work for Streams, because
we don't rely on producer "hashing" but specify the partition number
explicitly on send().
About not allowing to change the number of partition for changelog
topics: for Streams, this seems to imply that we need to creat
Hi,
I want to propose KIP-258 for the Streams API to allow storing
timestamps in RocksDB. This feature is the basis to resolve multiple
tickets (issues and feature requests).
Looking forward to your comments about this!
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-258%3A+Allow+to+Store+
Hey Jason,
I agree. Even apart from this proposal the partitioning strategy is really
an essential part of the metadata for a topic and had we been less lazy we
probably would have included it with the topic metadata.
I think in terms of grandfathering this in you could have existing topics
just
If we want to maintain ordering than for a pluggable producer-side
partitioner, it needs to coherent with the linear hashing scheme, i.e. we
effectively restrict what kind of customization users can do. However such
restrictions are hard to enforce programmatically unless we change the API,
so mayb
+1
I think we can improve this in the future, but this simple change will
avoid a lot of pain. Thanks for reviving it Ewen.
-Jay
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> I'd like to kick off voting for KIP-186:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 1
Thanks for running the release Ewen and great work everyone!
Ismael
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> The Apache Kafka community is pleased to announce the release for Apache
> Kafka
> 1.0.1.
>
> This is a bugfix release for the 1.0 branch that was first released wi
Matthias J. Sax created KAFKA-6621:
--
Summary: Update Streams docs with details for
UncaughtExceptionHandler
Key: KAFKA-6621
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6621
Project: Kafka
We have a 0.9 kafka cluster consists of 7 kafka-brokers colocated with 7
zookeepers
Producers/consumers are going full tilt at this cluster and we measure
delays in response time while we run disruptive tests
Delays in response time are 'acceptable' (a few seconds max) for the
following disruptio
+1 (non-binding)
Jonathan Skrzypek
-Original Message-
From: Bill Bejeck [mailto:bbej...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 March 2018 22:03
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-186: Increase offsets retention default to 7 days
+1
Thanks,
Bill
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Matthias J.
Hi Dong,
What is not clear to me is how the use of linear hashing affects the
partitioning logic in the producer, which the user is currently allowed to
customize through the Partitioner interface. It sounds like we are
effectively deprecating that interface since we will only provide ordering
gua
Hi Viktor,
Thanks for reviewing the KIP.
1. Yes, that is correct. Typically quotas would depend only on the current
partition state. But if you did want to track deleted partitions, you can
calculate the diff.
2. I can't think of an use case where ISRs or other replica information
would be useful
Daniel Qian created KAFKA-6620:
--
Summary: Documentation about "exactly_once" doesn't mention
"transaction.state.log.min.isr"
Key: KAFKA-6620
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6620
Project
22 matches
Mail list logo