Re: [DISCUSS]KIP-216: IQ should throw different exceptions for different errors

2018-04-07 Thread Matthias J. Sax
Thanks for updating the KIP and sorry for the long pause... Seems you did a very thorough investigation of the code. It's useful to understand what user facing interfaces are affected. (Some parts might be even too detailed for a KIP.) To summarize my current understanding of your KIP, the main c

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-6764) ConsoleConsumer behavior inconsistent when specifying --partition --from-beginning

2018-04-07 Thread Larry McQueary (JIRA)
Larry McQueary created KAFKA-6764: - Summary: ConsoleConsumer behavior inconsistent when specifying --partition --from-beginning Key: KAFKA-6764 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6764 P

Re: Dead link in Kafka Streams documentation

2018-04-07 Thread Stephane Maarek
Thanks Guozhang, everything works as expected now! Kind regards, Stephane [image: Simple Machines] Stephane Maarek | Developer +61 416 575 980 steph...@simplemachines.com.au simplemachines.com.au Level 2, 145 William Street, Sydney NSW 2010 On 8 April 2018 at 06:38, Guozhang Wang wrote: > I

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-280: Enhanced log compaction

2018-04-07 Thread Matthias J. Sax
Luís, thanks a lot for this KIP. Very interesting idea. Couple of questions: - Why do we need two new configs? Why is the topic config `compaction.strategy` not sufficient? - For Kafka Streams we did think about a timestamp base compaction at some point (internal brain storming)---we never th

Re: Dead link in Kafka Streams documentation

2018-04-07 Thread Guozhang Wang
I have pushed a hotfix PR for fixing the default version links in streams dev-guide. https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/commit/94f59b43d013dca2832fecfa1efe919f3b66ca90 Guozhang On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > Thanks for reporting the issue Stephane, I will fix it. > >

Re: Dead link in Kafka Streams documentation

2018-04-07 Thread Guozhang Wang
Thanks for reporting the issue Stephane, I will fix it. Guozhang On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Stephane Maarek < steph...@simplemachines.com.au> wrote: > https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/streams/developer-guide/ > > "Testing a Streams application" points to > https://kafka.apache.org/d

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-284 Set default retention ms for Streams repartition topics to Long.MAX_VALUE

2018-04-07 Thread Ted Yu
Several sections, such as 'Public Interfaces', only contain template. Can you modify the KIP so that it is easier to read ? Thanks On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:57 PM, khaireddine Rezgui wrote: > Hi guys, > > I created this KIP to get your feedback about the new default value of the > retention_ms

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-6763) Consider using direct byte buffers in SslTransportLayer

2018-04-07 Thread Ismael Juma (JIRA)
Ismael Juma created KAFKA-6763: -- Summary: Consider using direct byte buffers in SslTransportLayer Key: KAFKA-6763 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6763 Project: Kafka Issue Type:

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-283 Set default retention ms for Streams repartition topics to Long.MAX_VALUE

2018-04-07 Thread Ted Yu
Did you intend to say KIP-284 ? KIP-283 is for another proposal. Original message From: khaireddine Rezgui Date: 4/7/18 2:15 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-283 Set default retention ms for Streams repartition topics to Long.MAX_VALUE Hi guys,

[DISCUSS] KIP-284: Set default retention ms for Streams repartition topics to Long.MAX_VALUE

2018-04-07 Thread khaireddine Rezgui
Hi guys, I created this KIP to get your feedback about the new default value of the retention_ms in kafka stream repartion topics. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- 284%3A+Set+default+retention+ms+for+Streams+repartition+ topics+to+Long.MAX_VALUE The kip in under constructio

[DISCUSS] KIP-284 Set default retention ms for Streams repartition topics to Long.MAX_VALUE

2018-04-07 Thread khaireddine Rezgui
Hi guys, I created this KIP to get your feedback about the new default value of the retention_ms in kafka stream repartion topics. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-284%3A+Set+default+retention+ms+for+Streams+repartition+topics+to+Long.MAX_VALUE The kip in under construction

[DISCUSS] KIP-283 Set default retention ms for Streams repartition topics to Long.MAX_VALUE

2018-04-07 Thread khaireddine Rezgui
Hi guys, i init this discution aboutSetting new default value for kafka stream repartion topic.

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-276: Add StreamsConfig prefix for different consumers

2018-04-07 Thread Boyang Chen
Hey Ewen, could you provide some feedback on Matthias and Guozhang's reply? We hope to clear your concern and reach common understanding eventually. Thanks! Best, Boyang From: Boyang Chen Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 11:19 AM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-6762) log-cleaner thread terminates due to java.lang.IllegalStateException

2018-04-07 Thread Ricardo Bartolome (JIRA)
Ricardo Bartolome created KAFKA-6762: Summary: log-cleaner thread terminates due to java.lang.IllegalStateException Key: KAFKA-6762 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6762 Project: K

[VOTE] KIP-148: Add a connect timeout for client

2018-04-07 Thread ????????
Hi All, I have started a vote for this KIP, for more details of the discussions, please refer to the previous e-mails. The KIP can be found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-148%3A+Add+a+connect+timeout+for+client Thanks, David

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-148: Add a connect timeout for client

2018-04-07 Thread Ted Yu
Can you start another thread with [VOTE] in the subject ? Original message From: 东方甲乙 <254479...@qq.com> Date: 4/7/18 6:10 AM (GMT-08:00) To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-148: Add a  connect timeout for client Hi all, Do you have further concerns or questions about this K

Re?? [DISCUSS] KIP-148: Add a connect timeout for client

2018-04-07 Thread ????????
Hi all, Do you have further concerns or questions about this KIP? If not, would you please vote for it? Thank you very much! Best, David -- -- ??: ""<254479...@qq.com>; : 2017??6??16??(??) 10:45 ??: "dev"; : Re?