Re: [VOTE] KIP-868 Metadata Transactions

Thanks for this KIP, +1(non-binding) from me. -- Best, Ziming > On Sep 28, 2022, at 10:05 PM, David Jacot wrote: > > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. I really like the approach! > > Best, > David > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:20 AM Luke Chen wrote: >> >> Hi David, >> >> +1 (binding)

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mumrah merged pull request #450: MINOR Fix download links

mumrah merged PR #450: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/450 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-14265) Prefix ACLs may shadow other prefix ACLs

Colin McCabe created KAFKA-14265: Summary: Prefix ACLs may shadow other prefix ACLs Key: KAFKA-14265 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14265 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Bug

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mumrah merged pull request #449: MINOR Fix another missing code tag

mumrah merged PR #449: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/449 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mumrah merged pull request #448: MINOR fix errant code elements

mumrah merged PR #448: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/448 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mumrah merged pull request #447: Update and publish docs for 3.3

mumrah merged PR #447: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/447 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [kafka-site] niket-goel commented on a diff in pull request #447: Update and publish docs for 3.3

niket-goel commented on code in PR #447: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/447#discussion_r982914620 ## 33/ops.html: ## @@ -3401,6 +3401,121 @@ https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/2e952805431f9d4a7deef5c7f8453c63aa9702db -- This is an automated message from

[GitHub] [kafka-site] bbejeck commented on pull request #447: Update and publish docs for 3.3

bbejeck commented on PR #447: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/447#issuecomment-1261523307 @mumrah thanks for the update - I clicked around on a bunch of links and from what I can see the docs point to the correct ones, including the quickstart which points to 3.3 now --

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mumrah merged pull request #446: MINOR: quick fix for TOC handle

mumrah merged PR #446: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/446 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [kafka-site] bbejeck commented on pull request #446: MINOR: quick fix for TOC handle

bbejeck commented on PR #446: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/446#issuecomment-1261514052 @mumrah the latest commit fixes it - thanks for the update -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mumrah commented on a diff in pull request #447: Update and publish docs for 3.3

mumrah commented on code in PR #447: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/447#discussion_r982898151 ## 33/ops.html: ## @@ -3401,6 +3401,121 @@

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mumrah commented on pull request #446: MINOR: quick fix for TOC handle

mumrah commented on PR #446: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/446#issuecomment-1261503708 Somehow I completely missed that bar thing. I think that's the culprit here, let me see if I can track down where its coming from -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [kafka-site] niket-goel commented on a diff in pull request #447: Update and publish docs for 3.3

niket-goel commented on code in PR #447: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/447#discussion_r982881218 ## 33/ops.html: ## @@ -3401,6 +3401,121 @@ https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12679 Have those been pushed to the site already? -- This is an automated

[GitHub] [kafka-site] bbejeck commented on pull request #446: MINOR: quick fix for TOC handle

bbejeck commented on PR #446: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/446#issuecomment-1261467208  -- This is an automated message from

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-14259) BrokerRegistration#toString throws an exception, terminating metadata replay

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jose Armando Garcia Sancio resolved KAFKA-14259. Resolution: Fixed > BrokerRegistration#toString throws an

Re: [VOTE] 3.3.0 RC2

For those interested, here's a PR to fix the HTML rendering issue: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/446 -David On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 9:45 AM David Arthur wrote: > > Thanks Divij, we made a bunch of documentation changes at the last minute for > this release, so we’re trying to

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.3 #91

See

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mumrah opened a new pull request, #446: MINOR: quick fix for TOC handle

mumrah opened a new pull request, #446: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/446 Seen in the prerelease of the 3.3 docs, the TOC handle overlaps with the main contents of the `.right` div. The left margin for this div was "auto", which was not getting calculated correctly.

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-872: Add Serializer#serializeToByteBuffer() to reduce memory copying

Hi Divij Vaidya, Thanks for your comments. 1. I checked the code of KafkaProducer#doSend() and RecordAccumulator#append(), if KafkaProducer#doSend() returns it means serializedKey and serializedValue have been appended to ProducerBatch#recordsBuilder and we don't keep reference of serializedKey

Re: [VOTE] KIP-868 Metadata Transactions

+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP. I really like the approach! Best, David On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:20 AM Luke Chen wrote: > > Hi David, > > +1 (binding) from me. > > Thank you > Luke > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:02 PM David Arthur > wrote: > > > Hey folks, I'd like to start a vote on

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-870: Retention policy based on record event time

Hello Thank you for the KIP. Could you please add the following items to the KIP to make it easier to review. 1. Please add some more details on "Especially for Kafka Stream, we have seen many cases when users got bit by the current behavior.". What were the scenarios that impacted users of

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-870: Retention policy based on record event time

Hello! Please, share your feedback? Is proposed retention policy can be useful for Kafka users? > 21 сент. 2022 г., в 13:02, Николай Ижиков написал(а): > > Hello. > > I want to start discussion of KIP-870 [1] [2]. > > The goal of this KIP is to provide new retention policy purely based on

Re: [VOTE] 3.3.0 RC2

Thanks Divij, we made a bunch of documentation changes at the last minute for this release, so we’re trying to figure out when the issue was introduced. I’m hoping we can fix it before we send out the announcement. Thanks for calling it out :) Best, David On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:11 Divij

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-868 Metadata Transactions (new thread)

Thanks Luke, I failed to mention in my reply to Ziming, but I did add this sentence to the end of the "visibility" section: The metadata shell must also avoid showing partially committed metadata > transactions. -David On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:20 PM Luke Chen wrote: > Hi David, > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-852 Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

Hey folks Does anyone else have any thoughts on this before I propose this for a vote? -- Divij Vaidya On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 12:57 PM Satish Duggana wrote: > Thanks for the KIP Divij! > > This is a nice improvement to avoid recalculation of size. Customized RLMMs > can implement the best

Re: [VOTE] 3.3.0 RC2

Please ignore my previous email. Seems like that is a known issue and we plan to fix it after the release. Divij Vaidya On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 3:08 PM Divij Vaidya wrote: > Hey folks > > I noticed a non-blocking bug with the documentation page where the arrow > to left nav overlaps with the

Re: [VOTE] 3.3.0 RC2

Hey folks I noticed a non-blocking bug with the documentation page where the arrow to left nav overlaps with the text and a blue color vertical bar appears at the right side. Please see the highlighted elements in the attached image. In contrast, the current documentation page does not have this

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-872: Add Serializer#serializeToByteBuffer() to reduce memory copying

Hello I believe that the current behaviour of creating a copy of the user provided input is the correct approach because of the following reasons: 1. In the existing implementation (considering cases when T is ByteBuffer in Serializer#serialize(String,Headers,T)) we copy the data (T) into a new

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-14257) Unexpected error INCONSISTENT_CLUSTER_ID in VOTE response

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jianbin.chen resolved KAFKA-14257. -- Resolution: Done > Unexpected error INCONSISTENT_CLUSTER_ID in VOTE response >

Re: Commercial support

Hi Francois, I am not aware of such a page on the Apache Kafka website. There are a variety of companies that sell Kafka as a self-hosted platform or as a Cloud-hosted service. Those companies include Confluent (disclaimer: I work for them), Red Hat, AWS, Aiven, Instaclustr, Cloudera, and

Commercial support

Hi, I'm looking for a commercial support company page on the official website (https://kafka.apache.org) but I cannot find one. Is such of page exist? Regards, Francois