(as private method) that can
be called from `query()` method, but adding it to the interface seems to
defeat the purpose of IQv2.
Note, for existing IQv2 queries types that go against others stores, the
public methods already existed when IQv2 was introduces, and thus the
implementation of thes
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 11/3/23 7:55 AM, Chris Egerton wrote:
+1 (binding)
FWIW, I agree that this change should require a KIP. Gating upgrades of
visibility from private or package-private to protected may be cumbersome,
but it comes with the expectation that
I assume, results are returned by timestamp for each key. The KIP should
be explicit about it.
To be very explicit, should we rename the methods to specify the key
bound?
- withRange -> withKeyRange
- withLowerBound -> withLowerKeyBound
- withUpperBound -> withUpperKeyBou
Congrats, Satish!
Bruno
On 10/29/23 2:42 PM, John Roesler wrote:
Congratulations, Satish!
-John
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023, at 08:09, Randall Hauch wrote:
Congratulations, Satish!
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 1:47 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
Congratulations!
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 5:41 PM, Guozhang Wang
Hi Colt and Eduwer,
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 10/26/23 7:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 10/25/23 4:06 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
Happy to see this -- that's a +1 (binding) from me
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:33 AM Bill Bejeck wrote:
This is a
Hi all,
The PMC of Apache Kafka is pleased to announce a new Kafka committer
Yash Mayya.
Yash's major contributions are around Connect.
Yash authored the following KIPs:
KIP-793: Allow sink connectors to be used with topic-mutating SMTs
KIP-882: Kafka Connect REST API configuration
Hi all,
The PMC of Apache Kafka is pleased to announce a new Kafka committer
Lucas Brutschy.
Lucas' major contributions are around Kafka Streams.
Lucas' significantly contributed to the state updater
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10199) and he drives the
implementation of
Hi Hanyu,
I agree with what others said about having a `withDescendingOrder()`
method and about to document how the results are ordered.
I would not add a reverse flag and adding a parameter to each method in
RangeQuery. This makes the API less fluent and harder to maintain since
the flag
some better
name?) to allow specifying both bounds at once? The existing
`RangeQuery` does the same for specifying the key-range, so might be
good to add for time-range too?
-Matthias
On 9/6/23 5:01 AM, Bruno Cadonna wrote:
In my last e-mail I missed to finish a sentence.
"I think from a KIP
on the API for now, but I think it's important to
consider
how to implement the desired API, in case we come up with an API
that
cannot be implemented efficiently, or even at all!
Thoughts?
--
Nick
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 13:03, Bruno Cadonna
wrote:
Hi Nick,
6.
Of course, you are right
Congrats, Justine! Well deserved!
Best,
Bruno
On 9/25/23 5:28 AM, ziming deng wrote:
Congratulations Justine!
On Sep 25, 2023, at 00:01, Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
Congrats Justine!
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023, 17:45 Kirk True wrote:
Congratulations Justine! Thanks for all your great work!
Hi Levani,
I think you found a bug and you are looking at the right place!
I commented on the PR.
Best,
Bruno
On 10/10/23 3:02 PM, Levani Kokhreidze wrote:
Hello,
We’ve been looking at a https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10575 but
seems implementation has a bug and user defined
o omit `get`.
-Matthias
On 10/4/23 2:36 AM, Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi,
Regarding tombstones:
As far as I understand, we need to add either a validTo field to
VersionedRecord or we need to return tombstones, otherwise the result
is not complete, because users could never know a record was
Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 8:48 AM Nick Telford <
nick.telf...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Bruno,
4.
I'll hold off on making that change until we have a consensus as
to
what
configuration to use to control all of this, as it'll be
affected by
the
decision on EOS isolation levels.
5.
Done. I'v
Thanks for the KIP, Alieh!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 10/10/23 1:14 AM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
One more nit: as discussed on the related KIP-698 thread, we should not
use `get` as prefix for the getters.
So it should be `K key()` and `Optional asOfTimestamp()`.
Otherwise the KIP LGTM.
this option will force us to invoke StandbyUpdateLister once this
interval is reached.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 8:52 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Thanks for the KIP, Colt and Eduwer,
Are you sure there is also not a significant performance impact for
passing into the callback `currentEndOffset`?
I am asking bec
ED when processing.mode is anything other than
at-least-once. Do you think this would be acceptable?
In a later KIP, we can add support for query-time isolation levels and
solve this particular problem there, which would relax this restriction.
Regards,
Nick
On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 09:30, Bruno Cad
Thanks Stan!
+1
Best,
Bruno
On 10/10/23 7:24 AM, Luke Chen wrote:
Thanks Stanislav!
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:05 AM Josep Prat
wrote:
Thanks Stanislav!
———
Josep Prat
Aiven Deutschland GmbH
Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin
Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
Geschäftsführer:
tthias J. Sax wrote:
Bruno and I had some background conversation about the `get` prefix
question including a few other committers.
The official policy was never changed, and we should not add the
`get`-prefix. It's a slip on our side in previous KIPs to add the
`get`-prefix and we should actually
fixes an
issue introduced in 3.2.0 where in some of the error cases, the producer
interceptor is called twice for the same record.
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 6:34 AM Bruno Cadonna <mailto:cado...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
This is a gently reminder to vot
://jenkins.confluent.io/job/system-test-kafka/job/3.2/24/
Thank you to Michal for voting on the release candidate.
Best,
Bruno
On 15.04.22 21:05, Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 3.2.0.
* log4j 1.x is replaced
arity and even
review that ;-)
Cheers,
Alieh
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 7:13 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Alieh,
First of all, I like the examples.
Is validTo in VersionedRecord exclusive or inclusive?
In the javadocs you write:
"@param validTothe latest timestamp that value is valid"
I
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:03 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the blog post for the Apache Kafka 3.2.0 release:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/kafka/?previewEntry=what-s-new-in-apache8
I will accept comments until Monday, May 16th EOD PT.
Best,
Bruno
On 06.05.22 14:52, 'Da
Thanks Tom!
On 16.05.22 10:25, David Jacot wrote:
Thanks for driving this release, Tom!
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:50 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
The Apache Kafka community is pleased to announce the release for
Apache Kafka 3.1.1
Apache Kafka 3.1.1 is a bugfix release and 30 issues have been
Hi Bruno,
One clarification, the documentation that was updated is not shipped with
the release - it's only on the website. As you said, the website can be
updated at any time.
Ismael
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 4:16 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Divij,
The documentation that is shipped with Apache K
Khamphousone, bozhao12,
Bruno Cadonna, Chang, Chia-Ping Tsai, Chris Egerton, Colin P. Mccabe,
Colin Patrick McCabe, Cong Ding, David Arthur, David Jacot, David Mao,
defhacks, dengziming, Ed B, Edwin, florin-akermann, GauthamM-official,
GuoPhilipse, Guozhang Wang, Hao Li, Haoze Wu, Idan Kamara
:
Perhaps, we want to merge in https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12164
before this release?
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 11:30 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Mickael,
Thanks a lot!
Totally, missed that!
Best,
Bruno
On 16.05.22 10:13, Mickael Maison wrote:
Hi Bruno,
The blog post looks
te another KIP explaining the builder approach or do you prefer to do
it?
Kr,
F.
Le mer. 11 mai 2022 à 09:46, Bruno Cadonna a écrit :
Hi Francois and Chris,
I find the idea of the builder interesting.
I think we should go ahead with the current KIP as it is to allow
Francois to fix his
Jakub Scholz wrote:
+1 (non-binding).
I used the Scala 2.13 binaries and the staged Maven artifacts and ran
various tests with them. Thanks for doing the release.
Jakub
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 4:07 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
This is the second
Hi Sagar,
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Bruno
On 24.05.22 18:22, Sagar wrote:
Hi John,
No worries. addMetric throws an exception which needs to be handled. This
new method removes that need similar to what you have done for the sensor
method.
Thanks!
Sagar.
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 8:19 PM Guozhang
to
remove them during PR review:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12121#discussion_r875156714
3) I updated the KIP with the function name you suggested.
Thanks!
Sagar.
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 9:34 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Sagar, Thanks for the KIP!
1. Could you please add the class to which you
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
Bruno
On 30.05.22 09:36, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
Hey all,
I'd like to kick off the voting thread for the KIP I proposed to add
processor-level "bytes/records produced" metrics to Kafka Streams.
Thanks!
KIP-846: Task-level Streams metrics for bytes/records Produced
Thanks for the KIP, Sophie!
I am also in favor of this KIP!
I have one minor question:
Why does the title of the KIP talk about task-level metrics, but the
specified metrics are on processor-level?
For the rest, I am +1.
Best,
Bruno
On 29.05.22 00:20, John Roesler wrote:
Thanks for the
Hi Sagar,
Hi Ismael,
what about getOrCreateMetric()?
Best,
Bruno
On 28.05.22 18:56, Sagar wrote:
Hi Ismael,
Actually Bruno suggested renaming it to getMetricOrElseCreate and we
decided to go ahead with that one. These were the only names that we
considered for the KIP.
Thanks!
Sagar.
On
or creates
a sensor. How about using `metric` to follow the same naming convention?
Best,
David
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 9:18 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Sagar,
Hi Ismael,
what about getOrCreateMetric()?
Best,
Bruno
On 28.05.22 18:56, Sagar wrote:
Hi Ismael,
Actually Bruno suggested
Thanks for the PR, Alex!
I am also glad to see this coming.
1. Configuration
I would also prefer to restrict the configuration of transactional on
the state sore. Ideally, calling method transactional() on the state
store would be enough. An option on the store builder would make it
Hi Alexandre,
you should be all set now!
Thank you for your interest in Apache Kafka!
Best,
Bruno
On 18.05.22 09:40, Alexandre Garnier wrote:
Hi there!
I'd like to request permission to contribute to Kafka.
Wiki ID: zigarn
Jira ID: zigarn
Thanks,
hould we fix that typo?
Thanks!
-James
On May 17, 2022, at 9:01 AM, Bruno Cadonna wrote:
The Apache Kafka community is pleased to announce the release for Apache Kafka
3.2.0
* log4j 1.x is replaced with reload4j (KAFKA-9366)
* StandardAuthorizer for KRaft (KIP-801)
* Send a hint to the part
there is real value in doing it. We don't necessarily have to add all
the options to it but we could if it is proven to be useful. Anyway, I
would leave it for a future KIP.
+1 (binding)
Best,
David
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 9:47 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Guozhang,
thank you for the KIP!
I do not
Hi Guozhang,
thank you for the KIP!
I do not have strong feelings about the naming of the getter, but I tend
to agree with Luke.
Regarding, the adaptation of the kafka-consumer-group.sh script, I am
fine if we leave that for a future KIP.
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 01.07.22 06:05, Luke
Hi Nicola,
The ETA for Kafka 4.0 in which log4j will be updated to version 2 is
going to be released in the second half of 2023.
In the meanwhile we replaced log4j with reload4j in release 3.2.0.
Reload4j closes the known vulnerabilities of log4j1.
Out of curiosity, why do you reply to a
Sagar, Thanks for the KIP!
1. Could you please add the class to which you want to add the method in
section "Public Interfaces"? Ideally, in the header of the code part
that contains "prefixScan" currently.
2. Do you also plan to add overloads for metricOrElseCreate() similar as
for
Hi Michael,
I found that in Jira you are already part of the contributors.
I gave you contributor permissions in the wiki.
Thank you for your interest in Apache Kafka!
Best,
Bruno
On 20.07.22 06:20, Michael Negodaev wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to be added to the contributors list, so that I can
Congratulations Chris! Well deserved!
Best,
Bruno
On 26.07.22 05:24, Kumud Kumar Srivatsava Tirupati wrote:
Congratulations Chris!
On Tue, 26 Jul, 2022, 7:11 AM deng ziming, wrote:
Congratulations Chris !
--
Ziming
On Jul 26, 2022, at 5:01 AM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
Congrats! Well
s for the KIP proposal Alex.
1. Configuration default
You mention applications using streams DSL with built-in
rocksDB
state
store will get transactional state stores by default when
EOS
is
enabled,
but the default implementation for apps using PAPI will
fallback
to
non-transactional beha
for the reply. Your understanding is correct. This is a regression
introduced only in the 3.2 branch.
Sorry for the late notice.
Jun
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:04 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Jun,
Thank you for your message!
Now I see how this issue was introduced in 3.2.0. The fix for the bug
described
gt;> add/change the constructors that take only the properties?
Best,
Bruno
On 05.05.22 23:15, François Rosière wrote:
Hello Bruno,
The KIP as been updated. Feel free to give more feedbacks and I will
complete accordingly.
Kr,
F.
Le jeu. 5 mai 2022 à 22:22, Bruno Cadonna a écrit :
Hi Francois,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:04 AM Bruno Cadonna
wrote:
Hi Jun,
Thank you for your message!
Now I see how this issue was introduced in 3.2.0. The fix for the bug
described in KAFKA-12841 introduced it, right? I initially understood
that the PR you want to include is the fix for the bug
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kafka 3.2.0.
* log4j 1.x is replaced with reload4j (KAFKA-9366)
* StandardAuthorizer for KRaft (KIP-801)
* Send a hint to the partition leader to recover the partition (KIP-704)
* Top-level
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
I've got a green build with unit/integration tests:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/3.2/45/
Best,
Bruno
On 03.05.22 16:07, Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
This is the second
Thanks Jim,
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 10.05.22 21:19, John Roesler wrote:
Thanks Jim,
I’m +1 (binding)
-John
On Tue, May 10, 2022, at 14:05, Jim Hughes wrote:
Hi all,
I'm asking for a vote on KIP-834:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211882832
Thanks in
Thanks José!
+1
Best,
Bruno
On 11.05.22 04:38, John Roesler wrote:
+1 from me! Thanks for volunteering, José.
-John
On Tue, May 10, 2022, at 17:53, José Armando García Sancio wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to volunteer for the release of Apache Kafka 3.3.0. If
people agree, I'll start working
instances);
return this;
}
public KafkaProducer build() { ... }
}
Thoughts?
[1] -
https://kafka.apache.org/31/javadoc/org/apache/kafka/common/config/AbstractConfig.html#getConfiguredInstances(java.lang.String,java.lang.Class,java.util.Map)
Cheers,
Chris
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 4:55 PM Bruno Ca
e it respond to the question.
Kr,
F.
Le ven. 6 mai 2022 à 11:59, Bruno Cadonna a
écrit :
Hi Francois,
Thank you for updating the KIP!
Now the motivation of the KIP is much clearer.
I would still be interested in:
>> 2. Why do you only want to change/add the constructors that
take
the
>
This vote passes with 5 +1 votes (3 bindings) and no 0 or -1 votes.
+1 votes
PMC Members:
* Bill Bejeck
* Mickael Maison
* David Jacot
Committers:
* Luke Chen
Community:
* Jakub Scholz
0 votes
* No votes
-1 votes
* No votes
Vote thread:
lso remove section "Public Interfaces" since it does not
contain much information.
Best,
Bruno
On 09.05.22 17:45, Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Francois,
You can open a PR and people can review it, but it must not be merged
until the KIP is approved.
Best,
Bruno
On 09.05.22 16:07, Fr
Hi Jakub,
I added you to the contributors in Jira. You are now able to assign
tickets to yourself.
Thank you for your interest in Apache Kafka!
Best,
Bruno
On 10.05.22 00:22, Jakub Miroś wrote:
Hello,
I want to offer a help as a new contributor. Please add me to the Jira, my
ID is
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the KIP!
I am fine with the KIP in general.
However, I am with Sophie and John to also pause the standbys for the
reasons they brought up. Is there a specific reason you want to keep
standbys going? It feels like premature optimization to me. We can still
add keeping
Hi Francois,
Thanks for the KIP whose link is:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211882578
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 09.05.22 23:23, François Rosière wrote:
Hi Francois,
Thanks for the KIP!
Here my first feedback:
1. Could you please extend the motivation section, so that it is clear
for a non-Spring dev why the change is needed? Usually, a motivation
section benefits a lot from an actual example.
Extending the motivation section would also make
Hi Sagar,
I do not see an issue with using an empty list together with an empty
Optional. A non-empty Optional that contains an empty list would just
say that there is no partition to which the record should be sent. If
there is no partition, the record is dropped.
An empty Optional might
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 7:32 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Sagar,
I do not see an issue with using an empty list together with an empty
Optional. A non-empty Optional that contains an empty list would just
say that there is no partition to which the record should be sent. If
there is no partition
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 01.09.22 15:26, Colt McNealy wrote:
+1
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your work on the KIP. I'm not a committer so my vote is
non-binding but I strongly support this improvement.
Thank you,
Colt McNealy
*Founder, LittleHorse.io*
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022
30, 2022 at 8:55 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Sagar,
Thank you for the updates!
I do not intend to prolong this vote thread more than needed, but I
still have some points.
The deprecated partition method can return null if the default
partitioning logic of the producer should be used.
With the
if it looks fine now.
Thanks!
Sagar.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 3:00 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi,
I am favour of discarding the sugar for broadcasting and leave the
broadcasting to the implementation as Chris suggests. I think that is
the cleanest option.
Best,
Bruno
On 29.08.22 19:50, Chris Egerton
Hi Sagar,
Thank you for the KIP and sorry for being late to the party!
1.
The java docs for partitions() say:
"Note that returning a single valued list with value -1 is a shorthand
for broadcasting the record to all the partitions of the topic."
I guess that is not true anymore since the
Hi Francois,
I am not aware of such a page on the Apache Kafka website.
There are a variety of companies that sell Kafka as a self-hosted
platform or as a Cloud-hosted service.
Those companies include Confluent (disclaimer: I work for them), Red
Hat, AWS, Aiven, Instaclustr, Cloudera, and
Hi Snehashis,
You should be all set up, now!
Thank you for your interest in Apache Kafka!
Best,
Bruno
On 17.10.22 09:22, Snehashis wrote:
Hi team,
I would like to request contributor access to the project, to be able to
write KIPs and assign tickets to me.
Wiki ID: snehashisp
JIRA ID:
Hi Guozhang,
Thanks for the KIP! I think this KIP is a really nice addition to better
understand what is going on in a Kafka Streams application.
1.
The metric names "paused-active-tasks" and "paused-standby-tasks" might
be a bit confusing since at least active tasks can be paused also
Hi Sagar,
Thanks for the update and the PR!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 10.09.22 18:57, Sagar wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Thanks, I think these changes make sense to me. I have updated the KIP
accordingly.
Thanks!
Sagar.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:16 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Sagar,
I would
"restore"
(except
the "restoring-active-tasks") to "state-update", a.k.a
"state-update-ratio", "state-update-records-total",
"updating-standby-tasks" etc.
3. Regarding the function name: yeah I think that's a valid concern, I
can
ch
Hi Vicky,
Thanks for the KIP!
I think the KIP looks good!
You described how the self-join is optimized when the names of the state
stores are automatically generated by Streams. I think for completeness
you should also mention what happens when users explicitly name the
state stores of the
+1
Thanks Sophie!
Best,
Bruno
On 06.10.22 00:01, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
Hey all,
I'd like to volunteer as release manager for the next feature release,
which will be Apache
Kafka 3.4.0. If that sounds good to everyone I'll update this thread with
the release plan in the coming week.
Congrats Ziming!
Best,
Bruno
On 10.10.22 18:30, Jason Gustafson wrote:
Hi All
The PMC for Apache Kafka has invited Deng Ziming to become a committer,
and we are excited to announce that he has accepted!
Ziming has been contributing to Kafka for about three years. He has authored
more than
Hi Junyang Liu,
I added you to the contributors group in the Apache Kafka Jira.
Thank you for your interest in Apache Kafka.
Best,
Bruno
On 10.10.22 14:56, Junyang Liu wrote:
Jira ID: aglicacha
Thank you,
— Junyang Liu
/processor/internals/ProcessorStateManager.java#L250-L265
12.
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/549e54be95a8e1bae1e97df2c21d48c042ff356e/streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/state/internals/AbstractTransactionalStore.java#L84-L88
Best,
Alex
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:42 PM Bruno Cado
Congrats, Sophie!
Bruno
On 03.08.22 21:26, Jeremy Custenborder wrote:
Congrats Sophie!
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:25 AM David Arthur
wrote:
Well done! Congrats!
-David
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:48 AM Sagar wrote:
Congratulations Sophie !
On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 6:37 PM, José Armando
Hi Sophie,
Thank you for the KIP!
1.
I do not understand how autoscaling should work with a Streams topology
with a stateful sub-topology that reads from the input topics. The
simplest example is a topology that consists of only one stateful
sub-topology. As far as I understand the upstream
Congrats!
Best,
Bruno
On 10.01.23 11:00, Edoardo Comar wrote:
Many thanks everyone !
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 19:40, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Congratulations, Edo!
Regards,
Rajini
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 10:16 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
Congratulations!
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 01:14, Satish
Congrats!
Best,
Bruno
On 24.12.22 12:44, Manikumar wrote:
Congrats, Satish! Well deserved.
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022, 5:10 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
Congratulations!
On Sat, 24 Dec 2022 at 05:05, Luke Chen wrote:
Congratulations, Satish!
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 4:12 AM Federico Valeri
wrote:
Hi Chris and José,
I think the issue is not Streams related but has to do with the
following commit:
commit b66af662e61082cb8def576ded1fe5cee37e155f (HEAD, tag: 3.3.2-rc1)
Author: Chris Egerton
Date: Wed Dec 21 16:14:10 2022 -0500
Bump version to 3.3.2
The Streams upgrade system
Hi Justine,
Re-reading my message I realized that my message might be
misinterpreted. I meant that I am late with congratulating you due to
the holidays, NOT that it took you long becoming a committer!
Sorry for the potential confusion!
Best,
Bruno
On 11.01.23 08:57, Bruno Cadonna wrote
Hi Chris,
Thank you for the proposal!
Could you add some examples to each of your points?
I think that would make it easier to discussion them.
Best,
Bruno
On 12.01.23 03:15, Luke Chen wrote:
Hi Chris,
I like this idea.
Thanks for raising this!
One question to the template bullet:
• Does
Better late than never!
Congrats!
Best,
Bruno
On 04.01.23 20:25, Kirk True wrote:
Congratulations!
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, at 7:34 PM, John Roesler wrote:
Congrats, Justine!
-John
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, at 13:03, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
Congrats!
On 12/29/22 6:47 PM, ziming deng wrote:
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 07.12.22 17:24, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 12/1/22 9:39 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
Thanks to all who participated for a great discussion on this KIP. Seems
we're ready to kick off the voting on this, but please don't hesitate
ernalTopicManager.java#L318-L319
)
but this method is not called from anywhere, even though there are
unit
tests for it. I was unable to find history of this validation after
a
quick
search. Hopefully Matthias (or others) has context, otherwise I will
have a
closer look.
- Victoria
On We
Hi Victoria,
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 19.12.22 20:03, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 12/15/22 1:27 PM, John Roesler wrote:
Thanks for the thorough KIP, Victoria!
I'm +1 (binding)
-John
On 2022/12/15 19:56:21 Victoria Xia wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to start
Congrats Viktor!
Best,
Bruno
On 15.12.22 10:58, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote:
Thank you everyone! :)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:22 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
Congratulations Viktor!
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:06 AM Tamas Barnabas Egyed
wrote:
Congratulations, Viktor!
Congrats Ron!
Best,
Bruno
On 15.12.22 10:23, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote:
Congrats Ron! :)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:22 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
Congratulations Ron!
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 9:41 AM Eslam Farag wrote:
Congratulations, Ron ☺️
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 10:40 AM Tom Bentley
Congrats, Josep!
Well deserved!
Best,
Bruno
On 20.12.22 18:40, Kirk True wrote:
Congrats Josep!
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya wrote:
Congrats Josep!!
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022, 17:31 Greg Harris,
wrote:
Congratulations Josep!
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 9:29 AM
Hi all,
Thanks for the KIP, Victoria!
I have a couple of comments.
1. delete(key)
I think delete(key) should not remove all versions of a key. We should
use it to close the validity interval of the last version.
Assuming we have records of different versions for key A:
(A, e, 0, 2),
(A, f,
nable to find history of this validation after a quick
search. Hopefully Matthias (or others) has context, otherwise I will have a
closer look.
- Victoria
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 8:52 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for the KIP, Victoria!
I have a couple of comments.
1. delete(key)
I thi
Thanks for volunteering!
+1
Best,
Bruno
On 17.11.22 09:57, Luke Chen wrote:
Thanks for volunteering!
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 1:07 AM José Armando García Sancio
wrote:
+1. Thanks for volunteering.
--
-José
iled" something like that
3. Could this operation get aborted? I don't think so. Maybe there should
be a note in the KIP
Thank you.
Luke
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 2:15 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Sophie,
Thank you for the KIP!
1.
I do not understand how autoscaling should work with a Str
Hi Hao,
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 22.11.22 10:08, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
Hey Hao, thanks for the KIP -- I'm +1 (binding)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:57 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 11/21/22 7:39 AM, John Roesler wrote:
I'm +1 (binding)
Thanks for
at 3:51 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thank you for the proposal!
Could you add some examples to each of your points?
I think that would make it easier to discussion them.
Best,
Bruno
On 12.01.23 03:15, Luke Chen wrote:
Hi Chris,
I like this idea.
Thanks for raising this!
On
Congrats, Walker!
Well deserved!
Best,
Bruno
On 18.01.23 05:29, Sagar wrote:
Congratulations Walker!
Thanks!
Sagar.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:32 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
Congratulations!
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 01:26, John Roesler wrote:
Congratulations, Walker!
-John
On Tue, Jan 17,
Congrats Stan!
Well deserved!
Best,
Bruno
On 17.01.23 16:50, Jun Rao wrote:
Hi, Everyone,
The PMC of Apache Kafka is pleased to announce a new Kafka committer
Stanislav Kozlovski.
Stan has been contributing to Apache Kafka since June 2018. He made various
contributions including the
Guozhang,
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 25.10.22 22:07, Walker Carlson wrote:
+1 non binding
Thanks for the kip!
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:25 PM John Roesler wrote:
Thanks for the KIP, Guozhang!
I'm +1 (binding)
-John
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, at 16:36, Nick Telford
Hi Jonathan,
your PR was not approved by a committer. You need at least one approval
from a committer on a PR.
I left some comments.
Best,
Bruno
On 10.11.22 18:15, Jonathan Albrecht wrote:
Hi All,
I have a PR https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12343 that was approved in
June but has
301 - 400 of 654 matches
Mail list logo
