confluence access

2020-10-13 Thread Dániel Urbán
Hi, I'd like to access the wiki and contribute to KIPs, please add me. My username is urbandan. Thanks in advance, Daniel

Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override

2020-10-08 Thread Dániel Urbán
Thank you for the votes! The KIP passes with 3 binding votes (Manikumar, Mickael, Ismael) and 3 non-binding votes (Viktor, Kamal, David). Daniel Ismael Juma ezt írta (időpont: 2020. okt. 8., Cs, 16:27): > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:09 AM Dán

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-567: Kafka Cluster Audit (new discussion)

2020-10-01 Thread Dániel Urbán
any specific ideas about the implementation? > > Viktor > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:05 AM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > > > An example I had in mind was the ProduceResponse - the auditor might need > > access to the new end offset of the partitions. > > The event

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-567: Kafka Cluster Audit (new discussion)

2020-09-22 Thread Dániel Urbán
this to see > how it looks like and whether it solves the problem. To be honest I think > it would be better than publishing the request classes as an API because > here we're restricting access to only what is necessary. > > Thanks, > Viktor > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 202

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-567: Kafka Cluster Audit (new discussion)

2020-09-18 Thread Dániel Urbán
Hi, Thanks for the KIP. If the auditor needs access to the details of the action, one could argue that even the response should be passed down to the auditor. Is it feasible to convert the Java requests and responses to public API? If not, do we have another option to access this info in the

Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override

2020-08-31 Thread Dániel Urbán
ument name. Overall, I believe that this is a non-intrusive change - minor improvements without breaking changes. But for some, this would be a great improvement in using Kafka. Thank you in advance, Daniel Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 27., Cs, 17:52): > Hi all, > > Please

Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override

2020-08-27 Thread Dániel Urbán
Hi all, Please vote if you'd like to see this implemented. This one fixes a long-time debt, would be nice to see it pass. Thank you, Daniel Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 18., K, 14:06): > Hello everyone, > > Please, if you are interested in this KIP and PR, don't forge

Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override

2020-08-18 Thread Dániel Urbán
Hello everyone, Please, if you are interested in this KIP and PR, don't forget to vote. Thank you, Daniel Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 13., Cs, 14:00): > Hi David, > > Thank you for the suggestion. KIP-635 was referencing the --broker-list > issue, but based on you

Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override

2020-08-13 Thread Dániel Urbán
that PR asking if they plan to continue it. If > not, > we could do it as part of your PR directly. > > Cheers, > David > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Just a reminder, please vote if you are

Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override

2020-08-10 Thread Dániel Urbán
Hi everyone, Just a reminder, please vote if you are interested in this KIP being implemented. Thanks, Daniel Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 31., P, 9:01): > Hi David, > > There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open: > https://github.com/apache/kaf

Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override

2020-07-31 Thread Dániel Urbán
inding), thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán > &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override

2020-07-30 Thread Dániel Urbán
Hi everyone, If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. Thanks, Daniel Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 28., K, 16:06): > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > >

[VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override

2020-07-27 Thread Dániel Urbán
Hello everyone, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the GetOffsetShell tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new filtering options, and adding a config override option.

Re: 回复: [DISCUSS] KIP-308: GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, minimize the number of requests to server

2020-07-21 Thread Dániel Urbán
have a question about the > multiple-topic lookup situation. > > In a secured environment, what does the tool output if it has DESCRIBE > privileges for some topics but hasn't for others? > > > 发件人: Dániel Urbán > 发送时间: 2020年6月30日 22

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-308: GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, minimize the number of requests to server

2020-06-30 Thread Dániel Urbán
tool output if it has DESCRIBE > privileges for some topics but hasn't for others? > > ________ > 发件人: Dániel Urbán > 发送时间: 2020年6月30日 22:15 > 收件人: dev@kafka.apache.org > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-308: GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support > for

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-308: GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, minimize the number of requests to server

2020-06-30 Thread Dániel Urbán
> Yes, we can assign new id to this KIP. > > Thanks. > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:59 PM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > To help with the discussion, I also have a PR for this KIP now. > reflecting > > the current state of the KIP: https

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-308: GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, minimize the number of requests to server

2020-06-30 Thread Dániel Urbán
KIP with the same id: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=85474993 What is the protocol in this case? Should I acquire a new id for the GetOffsetShell KIP, and update it? Thanks in advance, Daniel Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jún. 30., K, 9:23): >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-308: GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, minimize the number of requests to server

2020-06-30 Thread Dániel Urbán
eed a separate option to pass an consumer property. > fewer options are better. > > Thanks, > Manikumar > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 8:53 PM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I see that this KIP turned somewhat inactive - I'd like to pick it up and > > w

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-308: GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, minimize the number of requests to server

2020-06-24 Thread Dániel Urbán
Hi, I see that this KIP turned somewhat inactive - I'd like to pick it up and work on it if it is okay. Part of the work is done, as switching to the Consumer API is already in trunk, but some functionality is still missing. I've seen the current PR and the discussion so far, only have a few

contributor request

2020-06-24 Thread Dániel Urbán
Hi, I'd like to work on some KIPs. Can you please add me to the contributors? My username is durban on both JIRA and Confluence. Thanks in advance, Daniel