Congrats, Jason. Well done and great to see this project inviting new
committers.
-Flavio
On 7 Sep 2016 04:58, "Ashish Singh" wrote:
> Congrats, Jason!
>
> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016, Jason Gustafson wrote:
>
> > Thanks all!
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 6,
Are you referring to something like this:
https://github.com/edwardcapriolo/gossip
ZooKeeper and other systems with a consensus core give you strong
guarantees with respect to the order of updates, and for example, you won't
be able to avoid split brain with current ISRs if you don't have this
I'm with you on the races that could happen in the scenarios you describe,
but I'm still not convinced that conditionally updating is the best call.
Instead of conditionally updating, the broker could fence off the old owner
to avoid spurious writes, and that's valid for all attempts. The
I'm with you on the races that could happen in the scenarios you describe,
but I'm still not convinced that conditionally updating is the best call.
Instead of conditionally updating, the broker could fence off the old owner
to avoid spurious writes, and that's valid for all attempts. The
Up to Ben to clarify, but I'd think that in this case, it is up to the
logic of B to decide what to do. B knows that the offset isn't what it
expects, so it can react accordingly. If it chooses to try again, then it
should not violate any application invariant.
-Flavio
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at
Could any of the kafka gods please add me as a contributor on jira?
Thank you!
-Flavio