Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Jason Gustafson

2016-09-07 Thread Flavio P JUNQUEIRA
Congrats, Jason. Well done and great to see this project inviting new committers. -Flavio On 7 Sep 2016 04:58, "Ashish Singh" wrote: > Congrats, Jason! > > On Tuesday, September 6, 2016, Jason Gustafson wrote: > > > Thanks all! > > > > On Tue, Sep 6,

Re: Using zookeeper vs gossip protocols in Kafka

2016-06-01 Thread Flavio P JUNQUEIRA
Are you referring to something like this: https://github.com/edwardcapriolo/gossip ZooKeeper and other systems with a consensus core give you strong guarantees with respect to the order of updates, and for example, you won't be able to avoid split brain with current ISRs if you don't have this

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-27 - Conditional Publish

2015-07-20 Thread Flavio P JUNQUEIRA
I'm with you on the races that could happen in the scenarios you describe, but I'm still not convinced that conditionally updating is the best call. Instead of conditionally updating, the broker could fence off the old owner to avoid spurious writes, and that's valid for all attempts. The

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-27 - Conditional Publish

2015-07-20 Thread Flavio P JUNQUEIRA
I'm with you on the races that could happen in the scenarios you describe, but I'm still not convinced that conditionally updating is the best call. Instead of conditionally updating, the broker could fence off the old owner to avoid spurious writes, and that's valid for all attempts. The

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-27 - Conditional Publish

2015-07-20 Thread Flavio P JUNQUEIRA
Up to Ben to clarify, but I'd think that in this case, it is up to the logic of B to decide what to do. B knows that the offset isn't what it expects, so it can react accordingly. If it chooses to try again, then it should not violate any application invariant. -Flavio On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at

Add as contributor

2015-07-07 Thread Flavio P JUNQUEIRA
Could any of the kafka gods please add me as a contributor on jira? Thank you! -Flavio