Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Thank you for the votes! The KIP passes with 3 binding votes (Manikumar, Mickael, Ismael) and 3 non-binding votes (Viktor, Kamal, David). Daniel Ismael Juma ezt írta (időpont: 2020. okt. 8., Cs, 16:27): > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:09 AM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the GetOffsetShell > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new filtering > > options, and adding a config override option. > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be changed as > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as some of its > > motivations were outdated. > > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:09 AM Dániel Urbán wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the GetOffsetShell > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new filtering > options, and adding a config override option. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be changed as > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as some of its > motivations were outdated. > > Thanks, > Daniel >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP Daniel On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:31 PM Dániel Urbán wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to ask you to consider voting for this KIP, it only needs 2 more > binding votes. > > This KIP focuses on the GetOffsetShell tool. The tool is useful for > monitoring and investigations as well. > Unfortunately, the tool misses one key, and some quality-of-life features: > - Because of lack of configuration options, it cannot be used with secure > clusters - which makes it unviable in many use-cases. > - Only supports a single topic - usability improvement, also in line with > other tools using pattern based matching. > - Still utilizes the deprecated "--broker-list" argument name. > > Overall, I believe that this is a non-intrusive change - minor improvements > without breaking changes. But for some, this would be a great improvement > in using Kafka. > > Thank you in advance, > Daniel > > > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 27., Cs, > 17:52): > > > Hi all, > > > > Please vote if you'd like to see this implemented. This one fixes a > > long-time debt, would be nice to see it pass. > > > > Thank you, > > Daniel > > > > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 18., > > K, 14:06): > > > >> Hello everyone, > >> > >> Please, if you are interested in this KIP and PR, don't forget to vote. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Daniel > >> > >> Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 13., > >> Cs, 14:00): > >> > >>> Hi David, > >>> > >>> Thank you for the suggestion. KIP-635 was referencing the --broker-list > >>> issue, but based on your suggestion, I pinged the PR > >>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123. > >>> Since I got no response, I updated KIP-635 to deprecate --broker-list. > >>> Will update the PR related to KIP-635 to reflect that change. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Daniel > >>> > >>> David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 10., H, > >>> 20:48): > >>> > Hi Daniel, > > I was not aware of that PR. At minimum, I would add `--bootstrap-server` > to the list in the KIP for completeness. Regarding the implementation, > I would leave a comment in that PR asking if they plan to continue it. > If > not, > we could do it as part of your PR directly. > > Cheers, > David > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Just a reminder, please vote if you are interested in this KIP being > > implemented. > > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > > > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. > 31., P, > > 9:01): > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open: > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123 > > > Wasn't sure if it will go in, and wanted to avoid conflicts. Do you > think > > > I should do the switch to '--bootstrap-server' anyway? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Daniel > > > > > > David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. > 30., Cs, > > > 17:52): > > > > > >> Hi Daniel, > > >> > > >> Thanks for the KIP. > > >> > > >> It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499. > > >> KAFKA-8507 > > >> is resolved > > >> by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest > to > > >> include "--bootstrap-server" > > >> in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the > > >> implementation. > > >> > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> David > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash < > > >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar < > manikumar.re...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > +1 (binding) > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks for the KIP! > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán < > urb.dani...@gmail.com > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi everyone, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to > vote. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > Daniel > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta > (időpont: > > >> 2020. > > >> > > > júl. > > >> > > > 28., K, 16:06): > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán < > > >> urb.dani...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hello everyone, > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'd like to start
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hello everyone, I'd like to ask you to consider voting for this KIP, it only needs 2 more binding votes. This KIP focuses on the GetOffsetShell tool. The tool is useful for monitoring and investigations as well. Unfortunately, the tool misses one key, and some quality-of-life features: - Because of lack of configuration options, it cannot be used with secure clusters - which makes it unviable in many use-cases. - Only supports a single topic - usability improvement, also in line with other tools using pattern based matching. - Still utilizes the deprecated "--broker-list" argument name. Overall, I believe that this is a non-intrusive change - minor improvements without breaking changes. But for some, this would be a great improvement in using Kafka. Thank you in advance, Daniel Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 27., Cs, 17:52): > Hi all, > > Please vote if you'd like to see this implemented. This one fixes a > long-time debt, would be nice to see it pass. > > Thank you, > Daniel > > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 18., > K, 14:06): > >> Hello everyone, >> >> Please, if you are interested in this KIP and PR, don't forget to vote. >> >> Thank you, >> Daniel >> >> Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 13., >> Cs, 14:00): >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> Thank you for the suggestion. KIP-635 was referencing the --broker-list >>> issue, but based on your suggestion, I pinged the PR >>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123. >>> Since I got no response, I updated KIP-635 to deprecate --broker-list. >>> Will update the PR related to KIP-635 to reflect that change. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Daniel >>> >>> David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 10., H, >>> 20:48): >>> Hi Daniel, I was not aware of that PR. At minimum, I would add `--bootstrap-server` to the list in the KIP for completeness. Regarding the implementation, I would leave a comment in that PR asking if they plan to continue it. If not, we could do it as part of your PR directly. Cheers, David On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Dániel Urbán wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Just a reminder, please vote if you are interested in this KIP being > implemented. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 31., P, > 9:01): > > > Hi David, > > > > There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open: > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123 > > Wasn't sure if it will go in, and wanted to avoid conflicts. Do you think > > I should do the switch to '--bootstrap-server' anyway? > > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > > > David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 30., Cs, > > 17:52): > > > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> Thanks for the KIP. > >> > >> It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499. > >> KAFKA-8507 > >> is resolved > >> by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest to > >> include "--bootstrap-server" > >> in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the > >> implementation. > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> David > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash < > >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar < manikumar.re...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 (binding) > >> > > > >> > > Thanks for the KIP! > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán < urb.dani...@gmail.com > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi everyone, > >> > > > > >> > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > Daniel > >> > > > > >> > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: > >> 2020. > >> > > > júl. > >> > > > 28., K, 16:06): > >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán < > >> urb.dani...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hello everyone, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the > >> > > > GetOffsetShell > >> > > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding > new > >> > > > filtering > >> > > > > > options, and adding a config override option. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hi all, Please vote if you'd like to see this implemented. This one fixes a long-time debt, would be nice to see it pass. Thank you, Daniel Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 18., K, 14:06): > Hello everyone, > > Please, if you are interested in this KIP and PR, don't forget to vote. > > Thank you, > Daniel > > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 13., > Cs, 14:00): > >> Hi David, >> >> Thank you for the suggestion. KIP-635 was referencing the --broker-list >> issue, but based on your suggestion, I pinged the PR >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123. >> Since I got no response, I updated KIP-635 to deprecate --broker-list. >> Will update the PR related to KIP-635 to reflect that change. >> >> Thanks, >> Daniel >> >> David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 10., H, >> 20:48): >> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> I was not aware of that PR. At minimum, I would add `--bootstrap-server` >>> to the list in the KIP for completeness. Regarding the implementation, >>> I would leave a comment in that PR asking if they plan to continue it. If >>> not, >>> we could do it as part of your PR directly. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> David >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Dániel Urbán >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi everyone, >>> > >>> > Just a reminder, please vote if you are interested in this KIP being >>> > implemented. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Daniel >>> > >>> > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. >>> 31., P, >>> > 9:01): >>> > >>> > > Hi David, >>> > > >>> > > There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open: >>> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123 >>> > > Wasn't sure if it will go in, and wanted to avoid conflicts. Do you >>> think >>> > > I should do the switch to '--bootstrap-server' anyway? >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > Daniel >>> > > >>> > > David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. >>> 30., Cs, >>> > > 17:52): >>> > > >>> > >> Hi Daniel, >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks for the KIP. >>> > >> >>> > >> It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499. >>> > >> KAFKA-8507 >>> > >> is resolved >>> > >> by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest to >>> > >> include "--bootstrap-server" >>> > >> in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the >>> > >> implementation. >>> > >> >>> > >> +1 (non-binding) >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks, >>> > >> David >>> > >> >>> > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash < >>> > >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! >>> > >> > >>> > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar < >>> manikumar.re...@gmail.com> >>> > >> > wrote: >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > +1 (binding) >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > Thanks for the KIP! >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán < >>> urb.dani...@gmail.com >>> > > >>> > >> > > wrote: >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > Hi everyone, >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to >>> vote. >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > Thanks, >>> > >> > > > Daniel >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta >>> (időpont: >>> > >> 2020. >>> > >> > > > júl. >>> > >> > > > 28., K, 16:06): >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán < >>> > >> urb.dani...@gmail.com >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > wrote: >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > Hello everyone, >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the >>> > >> > > > GetOffsetShell >>> > >> > > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, >>> adding >>> > new >>> > >> > > > filtering >>> > >> > > > > > options, and adding a config override option. >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] >>> KIP-308: >>> > >> > > > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for >>> multiple >>> > >> topics, >>> > >> > > > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to >>> be >>> > >> > changed >>> > >> > > as >>> > >> > > > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be >>> renamed, as >>> > >> some >>> > >> > of >>> > >> > > > its >>> > >> > > > > > motivations were outdated. >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > Thanks, >>> > >> > > > > > Daniel >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > >>> >>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hello everyone, Please, if you are interested in this KIP and PR, don't forget to vote. Thank you, Daniel Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 13., Cs, 14:00): > Hi David, > > Thank you for the suggestion. KIP-635 was referencing the --broker-list > issue, but based on your suggestion, I pinged the PR > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123. > Since I got no response, I updated KIP-635 to deprecate --broker-list. > Will update the PR related to KIP-635 to reflect that change. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 10., H, > 20:48): > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I was not aware of that PR. At minimum, I would add `--bootstrap-server` >> to the list in the KIP for completeness. Regarding the implementation, >> I would leave a comment in that PR asking if they plan to continue it. If >> not, >> we could do it as part of your PR directly. >> >> Cheers, >> David >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Dániel Urbán >> wrote: >> >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > Just a reminder, please vote if you are interested in this KIP being >> > implemented. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Daniel >> > >> > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. >> 31., P, >> > 9:01): >> > >> > > Hi David, >> > > >> > > There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open: >> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123 >> > > Wasn't sure if it will go in, and wanted to avoid conflicts. Do you >> think >> > > I should do the switch to '--bootstrap-server' anyway? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Daniel >> > > >> > > David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 30., >> Cs, >> > > 17:52): >> > > >> > >> Hi Daniel, >> > >> >> > >> Thanks for the KIP. >> > >> >> > >> It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499. >> > >> KAFKA-8507 >> > >> is resolved >> > >> by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest to >> > >> include "--bootstrap-server" >> > >> in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the >> > >> implementation. >> > >> >> > >> +1 (non-binding) >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> David >> > >> >> > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash < >> > >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar < >> manikumar.re...@gmail.com> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > +1 (binding) >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Thanks for the KIP! >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán < >> urb.dani...@gmail.com >> > > >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > Hi everyone, >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to >> vote. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Thanks, >> > >> > > > Daniel >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta >> (időpont: >> > >> 2020. >> > >> > > > júl. >> > >> > > > 28., K, 16:06): >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán < >> > >> urb.dani...@gmail.com >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Hello everyone, >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the >> > >> > > > GetOffsetShell >> > >> > > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding >> > new >> > >> > > > filtering >> > >> > > > > > options, and adding a config override option. >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] >> KIP-308: >> > >> > > > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple >> > >> topics, >> > >> > > > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to >> be >> > >> > changed >> > >> > > as >> > >> > > > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, >> as >> > >> some >> > >> > of >> > >> > > > its >> > >> > > > > > motivations were outdated. >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks, >> > >> > > > > > Daniel >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hi David, Thank you for the suggestion. KIP-635 was referencing the --broker-list issue, but based on your suggestion, I pinged the PR https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123. Since I got no response, I updated KIP-635 to deprecate --broker-list. Will update the PR related to KIP-635 to reflect that change. Thanks, Daniel David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. aug. 10., H, 20:48): > Hi Daniel, > > I was not aware of that PR. At minimum, I would add `--bootstrap-server` > to the list in the KIP for completeness. Regarding the implementation, > I would leave a comment in that PR asking if they plan to continue it. If > not, > we could do it as part of your PR directly. > > Cheers, > David > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Just a reminder, please vote if you are interested in this KIP being > > implemented. > > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > > > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 31., > P, > > 9:01): > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open: > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123 > > > Wasn't sure if it will go in, and wanted to avoid conflicts. Do you > think > > > I should do the switch to '--bootstrap-server' anyway? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Daniel > > > > > > David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 30., > Cs, > > > 17:52): > > > > > >> Hi Daniel, > > >> > > >> Thanks for the KIP. > > >> > > >> It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499. > > >> KAFKA-8507 > > >> is resolved > > >> by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest to > > >> include "--bootstrap-server" > > >> in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the > > >> implementation. > > >> > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> David > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash < > > >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar < > manikumar.re...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > +1 (binding) > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks for the KIP! > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán < > urb.dani...@gmail.com > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi everyone, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > Daniel > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta > (időpont: > > >> 2020. > > >> > > > júl. > > >> > > > 28., K, 16:06): > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán < > > >> urb.dani...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hello everyone, > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the > > >> > > > GetOffsetShell > > >> > > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding > > new > > >> > > > filtering > > >> > > > > > options, and adding a config override option. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > > >> > > > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple > > >> topics, > > >> > > > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be > > >> > changed > > >> > > as > > >> > > > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, > as > > >> some > > >> > of > > >> > > > its > > >> > > > > > motivations were outdated. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > > Daniel > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hi Daniel, I was not aware of that PR. At minimum, I would add `--bootstrap-server` to the list in the KIP for completeness. Regarding the implementation, I would leave a comment in that PR asking if they plan to continue it. If not, we could do it as part of your PR directly. Cheers, David On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Dániel Urbán wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Just a reminder, please vote if you are interested in this KIP being > implemented. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 31., P, > 9:01): > > > Hi David, > > > > There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open: > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123 > > Wasn't sure if it will go in, and wanted to avoid conflicts. Do you think > > I should do the switch to '--bootstrap-server' anyway? > > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > > > David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 30., Cs, > > 17:52): > > > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> Thanks for the KIP. > >> > >> It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499. > >> KAFKA-8507 > >> is resolved > >> by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest to > >> include "--bootstrap-server" > >> in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the > >> implementation. > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> David > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash < > >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 (binding) > >> > > > >> > > Thanks for the KIP! > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi everyone, > >> > > > > >> > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > Daniel > >> > > > > >> > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: > >> 2020. > >> > > > júl. > >> > > > 28., K, 16:06): > >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán < > >> urb.dani...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hello everyone, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the > >> > > > GetOffsetShell > >> > > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding > new > >> > > > filtering > >> > > > > > options, and adding a config override option. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > >> > > > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple > >> topics, > >> > > > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be > >> > changed > >> > > as > >> > > > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as > >> some > >> > of > >> > > > its > >> > > > > > motivations were outdated. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > Daniel > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hi everyone, Just a reminder, please vote if you are interested in this KIP being implemented. Thanks, Daniel Dániel Urbán ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 31., P, 9:01): > Hi David, > > There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open: > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123 > Wasn't sure if it will go in, and wanted to avoid conflicts. Do you think > I should do the switch to '--bootstrap-server' anyway? > > Thanks, > Daniel > > David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 30., Cs, > 17:52): > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Thanks for the KIP. >> >> It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499. >> KAFKA-8507 >> is resolved >> by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest to >> include "--bootstrap-server" >> in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the >> implementation. >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> David >> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash < >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +1 (binding) >> > > >> > > Thanks for the KIP! >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi everyone, >> > > > >> > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Daniel >> > > > >> > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: >> 2020. >> > > > júl. >> > > > 28., K, 16:06): >> > > > >> > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán < >> urb.dani...@gmail.com >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hello everyone, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the >> > > > GetOffsetShell >> > > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new >> > > > filtering >> > > > > > options, and adding a config override option. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: >> > > > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple >> topics, >> > > > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be >> > changed >> > > as >> > > > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as >> some >> > of >> > > > its >> > > > > > motivations were outdated. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > Daniel >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hi David, There is another PR linked on KAFKA-8507, which is still open: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8123 Wasn't sure if it will go in, and wanted to avoid conflicts. Do you think I should do the switch to '--bootstrap-server' anyway? Thanks, Daniel David Jacot ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 30., Cs, 17:52): > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for the KIP. > > It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499. KAFKA-8507 > is resolved > by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest to > include "--bootstrap-server" > in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the > implementation. > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > David > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash < > kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: > 2020. > > > > júl. > > > > 28., K, 16:06): > > > > > > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán < > urb.dani...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the > > > > GetOffsetShell > > > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new > > > > filtering > > > > > > options, and adding a config override option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > > > > > > > > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > > > > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple > topics, > > > > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be > > changed > > > as > > > > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as > some > > of > > > > its > > > > > > motivations were outdated. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hi Daniel, Thanks for the KIP. It seems that we have forgotten to include this tool in KIP-499. KAFKA-8507 is resolved by this tool still uses the deprecated "--broker-list". I suggest to include "--bootstrap-server" in your public interfaces as well and fix this omission during the implementation. +1 (non-binding) Thanks, David On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 1:52 PM Kamal Chandraprakash < kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Daniel > > > > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: 2020. > > > júl. > > > 28., K, 16:06): > > > > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the > > > GetOffsetShell > > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new > > > filtering > > > > > options, and adding a config override option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > > > > > > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > > > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, > > > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be > changed > > as > > > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as some > of > > > its > > > > > motivations were outdated. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
+1 (non-binding), thanks for the KIP! On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:31 PM Manikumar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. > > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: 2020. > > júl. > > 28., K, 16:06): > > > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the > > GetOffsetShell > > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new > > filtering > > > > options, and adding a config override option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > > > > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, > > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be changed > as > > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as some of > > its > > > > motivations were outdated. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:07 PM Dániel Urbán wrote: > Hi everyone, > > If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: 2020. > júl. > 28., K, 16:06): > > > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán > > wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the > GetOffsetShell > > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new > filtering > > > options, and adding a config override option. > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > > > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, > > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be changed as > > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as some of > its > > > motivations were outdated. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Daniel > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hi everyone, If you are interested in this KIP, please do not forget to vote. Thanks, Daniel Viktor Somogyi-Vass ezt írta (időpont: 2020. júl. 28., K, 16:06): > +1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the GetOffsetShell > > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new filtering > > options, and adding a config override option. > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > > > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, > > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be changed as > > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as some of its > > motivations were outdated. > > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
+1 from me (non-binding), thanks for the KIP. On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Dániel Urbán wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the GetOffsetShell > tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new filtering > options, and adding a config override option. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override > > The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: > GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, > minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be changed as > there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as some of its > motivations were outdated. > > Thanks, > Daniel >
[VOTE] KIP-635: GetOffsetShell: support for multiple topics and consumer configuration override
Hello everyone, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-635. The KIP enhances the GetOffsetShell tool by enabling querying multiple topic-partitions, adding new filtering options, and adding a config override option. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-635%3A+GetOffsetShell%3A+support+for+multiple+topics+and+consumer+configuration+override The original discussion thread was named "[DISCUSS] KIP-308: GetOffsetShell: new KafkaConsumer API, support for multiple topics, minimize the number of requests to server". The id had to be changed as there was a collision, and the KIP also had to be renamed, as some of its motivations were outdated. Thanks, Daniel