+1 (binding)
My only final comment would be that the topic.creation.enable setting could
potentially be left out. We're still backwards compatible with what we
promised before (or at least compatibility is debatable). You could enforce
not being able to create topics with ACLs anyway, so avoiding
+1 (non binding)
On Tue., 11 Sep. 2018, 10:48 am Mickael Maison,
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Thanks for the KIP!
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 8:40 AM McCaig, Rhys
> wrote:
> >
> > Looks great Randall
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > > On Sep 9, 2018, at 7:17 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 8:40 AM McCaig, Rhys wrote:
>
> Looks great Randall
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > On Sep 9, 2018, at 7:17 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> >
> > +1
> > Useful improvement, thanks Randall.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 3:28 PM Randall Hauch
Looks great Randall
+1 (non-binding)
> On Sep 9, 2018, at 7:17 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> +1
> Useful improvement, thanks Randall.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 3:28 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
>
>> I believe the feedback on KIP-158 has been addressed. I'd like to start a
>> vote.
>>
>> KIP:
>>
